Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy Apple Policy on new Macbook Pros hurting FCS Users

  • Apple Policy on new Macbook Pros hurting FCS Users

    Posted by Karim Daire on April 25, 2010 at 5:26 am

    Hi,

    I have been waiting to buy a new Macbook pro now since last year but it just keeps getting worse… no Firewire 400, just one Firewire 800 Port and now even no express card slots under 17inch Macbooks. All my Macbook Batteries were blown out after 1 – 1 1/2 years completely and now you can’t even exchange batteries? And who needs a SD Card slot anyways if you can use USB or the Express Slot?

    I especially wonder why they do that after Final Cut has penetreated the market and now they obviously don’t care about pro users.
    Are you all buying 17 inch macbooks now? This is insane, i need a portable handy laptop since I use external monitors anyway.

    What do companies like Matrox say whose hardware is useless below 17inch now and why should I pay 3000 Euro for a MACbook+FCStudio if I can get a windows machine with Adobe Production Suite and with Esata, Bluray Drive, and dozens of features apple drops or doesn’t implement?

    I am really confused and disappointed by the Apple strategy,

    Karim

    -Karim-

    Jonathan Clauson replied 16 years ago 13 Members · 15 Replies
  • 15 Replies
  • Zane Barker

    April 25, 2010 at 6:40 am

    [Karim Daire] “Apple Policy on new Macbook Pros hurting FCS Users”

    First of it not a policy it hardware

    Second its NOT new these are the second and in some cases third revisions of the MBP that have NOT have the the things you talk about.

    [Karim Daire] “no Firewire 400, just one Firewire 800 Port”

    Who cares about FW400 FW800 is 2 times as fast as 400

    [Karim Daire] “and now even no express card slots under 17inch Macbooks”

    this is the second revision of the machines that has not had express slot on the 15 NOT new

    [Karim Daire] “All my Macbook Batteries were blown out after 1 – 1 1/2 years completely and now you can’t even exchange batteries?”

    Thats because the old computers used old battery technology. Those old batteries were built to last only 300 cycles, the new ones are built to last 1000 cycles. Thats more then 3 times the overall life of the battery, not to mention how long they last on each charge. And the batteries can be changed, it is done through the genius bar at apple stores. The new batteries are WAY better, so your argument on them is null and void.

    [Karim Daire] “And who needs a SD Card slot anyways if you can use USB or the Express Slot? “

    Way more customers care about an SD slot then those that care about an express slot. 90% of people that have an express slot on their computer when asked what it is will not know.

    [Karim Daire] “Are you all buying 17 inch macbooks now?”

    According to my friend who sells at an Apple Store most people that do heavy video work and want portability were already getting the 17 anyway.

    Hindsight is always 1080p

  • Scott Sheriff

    April 25, 2010 at 7:38 am

    Except for a few limited circumstances, a laptop is a poor choice for an editing workstation. So it only makes sense that Apple doesn’t optimize them for that use.

    Scott Sheriff
    Director
    SST Digital Media
    https://www.sstdigitalmedia.com

  • Gary Askham

    April 25, 2010 at 8:52 am

    Although I agree that it would be nice for Apple to make a 12″ laptop which has Firewire 400, 800, Express Card slot, PCMCIA Slot, CF card reader, USB3, eSATA, SCSI, user replaceable batteries and a Blu-Ray burner you have to understand there are limitations to what a company like Apple can do.

    Their whole approach to making hardware is down to simplicity. There is a reason why there are only a limited number of configurations for their computers. It is so that they can keep it locked down and under control. Not like the Microsoft/Windows approach which is the opposite – wild and chaotic. Sure if you want you could probably find a PC computer which does everything you could possibly want – but who knows if the different components are going to work together. Apple know that the hardware they use works.

    I think Apple understand that most “professionals” don’t use a laptop as their primary machine. They use Mac Pro’s. Those that do can use a 17″.

    ————————
    FCP and Avid Technical Support
    Air Post Production
    Shoreditch – London

  • Rafael Amador

    April 25, 2010 at 1:00 pm

    [Scott Sheriff] “Except for a few limited circumstances, a laptop is a poor choice for an editing workstation. “
    When you have to edit in the field is the only solution.
    Without a laptop I simply couldn’t work, and as my self there are thousands of guys all around the world.
    I understand that Apple prefers selling 17″ than 15 or smaller, but I agree very much with Karim about that this policy hurts FC users. Apple is simply saying “take it or go somewhere else”.
    To simplify the hardware is very good, to give no options, no that much.
    rafael

    http://www.nagavideo.com

  • Walter Biscardi

    April 25, 2010 at 2:26 pm

    [Karim Daire] “Are you all buying 17 inch macbooks now? This is insane, i need a portable handy laptop since I use external monitors anyway.”

    Every editor I know that uses a MacBook Pro professionally is only using the 17″ model. This is because of the real estate of the screen and they are generally the models with the fastest CPUs.

    What’s so insane about wanting the fastest and best performance for your clients in the field? If you’re being paid to do a professional job in the field then your rate should cover the extra cost to purchase the machine. It might take you a few more jobs, but you’re still going to be able to pay for the machine.

    The MacBook Pro is not designed for Final Cut Pro Users. It’s designed to fulfill a variety of needs for a variety of users. Any of the MacBook Pros do work with FCP, but if you really want to use it well in the field, then the 17″ model is the one you want.

    [Karim Daire] “What do companies like Matrox say whose hardware is useless below 17inch now and why should I pay 3000 Euro for a MACbook+FCStudio if I can get a windows machine with Adobe Production Suite and with Esata, Bluray Drive, and dozens of features apple drops or doesn’t implement?”

    I don’t know, why should you? CS5 is certainly an option and if you want to go that route, I would suggest you do. If Apple no longer meets your needs, then move on. I did that 9 years ago with Media 100 to switch to Final Cut Pro and the moment Studio no longer meets my needs, I will move on to something else. CS5 is definitely a viable option right now, though if I do make the switch, I’m staying on Mac hardware.

    Walter Biscardi, Jr.
    Editor, Colorist, Director, Writer, Consultant, Author, Chef.
    HD Post and Production
    Biscardi Creative Media

    “Foul Water, Fiery Serpent” featuring Sigourney Weaver coming soon.

    Blog Twitter Facebook

  • Bj Ahlen

    April 25, 2010 at 3:40 pm

    Firewire 400 devices can be plugged into the FW800 jack on the newer MacBook Pro notebooks, you just need a small adapter that costs a few dollars.

  • Greg Ondera

    April 25, 2010 at 3:41 pm

    With all of this being said in this entire thread, I am an SxS XDCam user and in the field I use my 15″ laptop mostly for footage ingestion, rarely for editing. None of the changes really bother me except the potential of reduced ingestion speed having to use an external device. So what are the alternatives behind this kind of workflow?

    Greg Ondera
    http://www.Plexus.tv
    http://www.SurgeonToday.org

  • Shane Ross

    April 25, 2010 at 4:18 pm

    [walter biscardi] “Every editor I know that uses a MacBook Pro professionally is only using the 17” model. “

    Well, you know ONE editor who uses the 15″. Me. I have the generation BEFORE the SD card implimentation. I too find it stupid. They need to offer a 15″ with SD card, and one for the Express34. 17″ is too big for many things. And I have relied on my MBP for remote editing and capturing on many occasions. I’ll probably use it until it dies. The 17″ is too expensive.

    Shane

    GETTING ORGANIZED WITH FINAL CUT PRO DVD…don’t miss it.
    Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def

  • Rich Rubasch

    April 25, 2010 at 5:25 pm

    Also if I saw it correctly the 15 inch comes with 3 gigahertz processors but the 17″ has only one option. Hard drive and video card options and Max RAM are the same between 15 and 17 so in fact the 15″ can have an edge with processing.

    I think it’s nuts they don’t offer the Express card on the 15″ model.

    I would have to buy a new bag for the 17″.

    Rich Rubasch
    Tilt Media Inc.
    Video Production and Post
    Owner/President/Editor/Designer/Animator
    https://www.tiltmedia.com

  • Zane Barker

    April 25, 2010 at 5:29 pm

    Yes they should change it so you don’t have to buy a new bag.

    Hindsight is always 1080p

Page 1 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy