-
APPLE: PLEASE ADDRESS LA USER GROUP REQUEST: IMPROVED AUXILIARY TIMECODE
PLEASE FORWARD TO FINAL CUT PRO SOFTWARE DEVELOPERS
Many of us in the Los Angeles Final Cut Pro User Group and other forums have been talking about this for years. I do a lot of music video editing. One of my major complaints about FCP is the way it handles Auxiliary timecode. The major problem is that you can’t assign unique auxiliary timecode to each subclip without rippling the entire reel.
This makes it completely non-functional in a professional environment especially when several takes in a row will be on the same tape for example in a music video. This isn’t something only unique to music videos, however, its become an issue in commercials too where you have multiple takes say for something choreographed. The Apple support guys just say capture each clip separately but they obviously haven’t worked in a real professional post-production environment. At a busy facility there’s not enough time to tie a machine up so you can slowly toggle and log every single shot. Those of us professionals, especially if you’ve been on Avid, know that the fastest and most efficient way to breakdown a job is to digitize an entire tape first and THEN subclip/sync afterward.
The workaround I’ve resorted to is to sync all of my subclips and then exporting quicktimes and reimporting them back into the project and THEN assigning unique AUX TC to each new “master clip.” But come on guys this is a major oversight. You should be able to assign unique Auxiliary timecode at the subclip level without ripple this across the whole tape. This could be some sort of “soft” timecode for semantics sake. As a proud FCP user I got to say shame on Apple for ignoring the pro users. We have been requesting they fix this for years. In my opinion this will remain one of the many flaws in FCP that they need to fix if they ever seriously want to take on AVID. Instead of cannibalizing Shake and adding those feature into FCP (features that should probably remain in an effects package) PLEASE work on improving the actual EDITORIAL experience.
