Activity › Forums › Panasonic Cameras › Apple is driving down the flash media price
-
Apple is driving down the flash media price
Posted by Emery on September 2, 2005 at 8:39 pmhttps://thinksecret.com/news/0509ipod.html
If this turns out to be true (which think secret usually is) this will have big implications on the cost of flash media. They are going to sell an 8gig Mini for $300. Now I understand that P2 cards have to be faster and have higher production standards but there is a VERY large price difference here. Apple is taking advantage of the economy of scale and Im hoping that trickles down to P2 cards.
If Im not mistaken P2 cards use SD cards as opposed to Compact Flash. Is it not the case that CF capacities are generally higher and have better performance?
Toke replied 20 years, 8 months ago 9 Members · 19 Replies -
19 Replies
-
Vincent Rice
September 3, 2005 at 1:25 amIf anything this drives the price up. Apple contracts for the ENTIRE OUTPUT of the Samsung factory. Anyway its got nothing to do with the price of P2’s
-
Emery
September 3, 2005 at 1:35 amIt certainly will have an impact on the price of P2. Maybe not a direct impact but Apple is drastically driving the price down. Yes they will rape Samsung of every last card but it will force other companies to lower their prices in order to compete in the market. Scale is the number one factor that drives prices down. Sure companies get more efficient with production as well but its really scale that drives prices.
-
Noah Kadner
September 3, 2005 at 10:08 amHard to say what the impact specifically on P2 would be as these are not really related technologies. The SD chips in the P2 cards are not competing directly with the Flash memory used in the Ipods. There is not any interchaneability. It’s kind of like saying reducing the price of Coke will have an effect on Orange Juice consumption. There could be some effect or none depending on how perceptions are effected. Hopefully it will make the idea of solid state memory in general something people expect to pay less for but it seems like that’s already a given hope for P2.
Noah
-
Emery
September 3, 2005 at 3:35 pmI see your point Noah but I think the relationship is more closely related to a Coke/Pepsi comparison. I think its only a matter of time before third party companies start making products for this camera. A P2 or P2 like device could be made with compact flash cards. The price of any of the 3 leading solid state media formats (Compact Flash, SD, and Memory Stick) will effects the others. Manufacturers will build their devices to support the format with the best price/performance. Ofcourse there is some politics involved as well but generally this will force the competing memory types to lower their prices and push their production further. Maybe CF/SD is a coke/orange juice comparison but think about how much more coke is sold than orange juice. Yes you still have your oj buyers but it doesnt hold a candle compared to coke. When it comes to the tech industry, manufacturers will adopt the most economic solution, and in this particular situation, the end customer wont even “taste” the difference.
-
Vincent Rice
September 3, 2005 at 4:55 pm“Rape”? Inflamatory language for a simple commercial agreement. Apple invested in Samsung to help build the factory in the first place remember. I still don’t see any specific connection between this news and the price of P2 cards.
-
Blub06
September 3, 2005 at 6:52 pmHitachi this week announced the introduction (July 05) of a new 1 inch hard drive with motion detection to save the drive if it falls. It is an 8 gig drive and it is said that the drive will be found in new cell phones like Motorola
-
Noah Kadner
September 3, 2005 at 6:59 pmThere is not as clear a connection here because in the case of P2 Panasonic effectively controls the market. They have a vested and political interest in SD technology because it is a Panasonic invention. It would take a lot more than price lowering news from Samsung to make them dump SD in the P2 cards. And other manufacturers would not be able to create P2 cards based on other memory technologies without entering into a royalty contract with Panasonic because the P2 spec is proprietary as I understand it. But I do agree with you that Coke lowering its price can do nothing but good for the pricing of the rest of the beverage market at the very least on a perceptual level to the average consumer. It’s more a question of how many more of these types of announcements will truly alter the marketplace.
-
Emery
September 3, 2005 at 8:14 pmI wasnt aware SD was invented by Panasonic, that does make things a little different. Ive generally only used CF media. But as you’ve suggested it does put pressure on the “beverage market” in general when there are similar beverages out there for significantly lower price. All of these high capacity/high performance/low price media solutions (weather it be from hitachi, samsung, or anyone else) is good news for P2. Panasonic just wont be able to justify their prices, they will have to stay competitive with market cost and technologies. As far as third party companies making P2 devices goes, yes they will have to pay royalties. Im not very familiar with copy write and patent law but i dont really understand why a company would have to pay royalties for anything. Couldn’t they make a non P2 device that is simply inserted into the P2 data port? Do you have to pay royalties for figuring out what data is coming out of the P2 “data port,” figuring out how to record it and enclosing it inside a device that fits the P2 form factor? What makes P2 P2?
-
Emery
September 3, 2005 at 8:17 pmSettle down, I wasnt using “rape” in the traditional sense. Just trying to emphasize that apple will being using all of their drives and therefore no one else will be able to take advantage of samsungs low price (at least not for a while.) And if you have read my post youd see that i have conceded there is no direct relationship between samsungs low cost CF and P2. Its an overall market thing.
-
Häakon
September 3, 2005 at 8:45 pmAn 8GB P2 card costs under $2,000. Still extremely expensive, but not nearly as bad as your post indicates.
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up