Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Creative Community Conversations Anyone like the color board?

  • Anyone like the color board?

    Posted by Andy Lewis on September 28, 2011 at 3:00 pm

    Color was my favourite part of FCP3 and I loved the interface. The main thing I wanted from FCP8 was Color without round tripping. I’ve just done too many projects that needed editing changes after colour correction. I’m tired of frankenstein timelines from multiple Color exports. I’ve even gone back to the 3-way colour corrector for a recent project in FCP7.

    So anyway, I’ve played with the color board and it seems horrendous. Any love for it out there? Does it make sense to anyone?

    All this talk about FCPX trashing NLE terminology and UI conventions… What about dumping the 200-hundred-year-old colour wheel?

    “Goethe’s Theory of Colours provided the first systematic study of the physiological effects of color (1810). His observations on the effect of opposed colors led him to a symmetric arrangement of his color wheel, “for the colours diametrically opposed to each other… are those that reciprocally evoke each other in the eye.” (Goethe, Theory of Colours, 1810 [8])”

    https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Color_wheel

    Michael Gissing replied 14 years, 7 months ago 19 Members · 41 Replies
  • 41 Replies
  • Brian Mulligan

    September 28, 2011 at 3:21 pm

    Didn’t you hear… ‘Apple reinvented the (color)wheel’

    Brian Mulligan
    Senior Editor – Autodesk Smoke
    WTHR-TV Indianapolis,IN, USA
    Twitter: @bkmeditor

  • Craig Seeman

    September 28, 2011 at 3:25 pm

    This from Stu Maschwitz of RedGiant and professional colorist.
    https://prolost.com/blog/2011/9/27/what-adobe-should-do-with-iridas-speedgrade.html

    But moving a project to a dedicated color app is simply not the way of the future for most users. Apple has the right idea by killing Color and making color correction a native property of every clip in a FCP X timeline—even if those new color controls are—how should I say this—a Colorista opportunity.

    This is important, so I’ll say it another way: Apple screwed up by making the FCP X “Color Board” less industry-standard (I mean sure, dream up a better way—but it has to actually be better), but their decision to make color controls part of the settings inherent to any clip in the timeline is spot-on.

    Color Board is a problem but the idea of building it into each clip is not.

  • Alan Okey

    September 28, 2011 at 3:29 pm

    [andy lewis] “All this talk about FCPX trashing NLE terminology and UI conventions… What about dumping the 200-hundred-year-old colour wheel?”

    Apple apparently felt that color wheels were too complicated for the majority of their intended audience. Thus, they created the Color Board.

    Think of it as the Office Assistant for grading – kind of like Clippy for color.

    “It looks like you’re trying to remove red! Just click and drag here!”

  • Craig Seeman

    September 28, 2011 at 4:38 pm

    [Alan Okey] “Apple apparently felt that color wheels were too complicated for the majority of their intended audience.”

    I suspect it was more of a UI issue. I’d think the color wheel is easier to understand because you can see the complimentary colors. If you “remove” a color on the Color Board you’d have no idea why the color was shifting to a different color.

    RippleTraining did a workaround creating a Motion effect apparently to give you a color wheel.
    https://www.rippletraining.com/using-the-rt-color-balance-effect-in-final-cut-pro-x.html

    I think Apple uses the Color Board because they probably thought it was awkward to have three color wheels instead of a single board with pucks for overall, high, mids, low.

  • Walter Soyka

    September 28, 2011 at 4:39 pm

    [Craig Seeman] “Color Board is a problem but the idea of building it into each clip is not.”

    Agreed. Conform hurts, but it’s a necessary evil for using specialized tools. Avoiding conform where possible makes late change much easier.

    Stu’s “digital rebel” POV has historically been to use the general-purpose apps you have for as many purposes as possible, extending them out of their normal areas of responsibility to save money. That’s a fine goal for many projects, but a dedicated app offers specific tools and workflows that general apps don’t.

    Personally, I’d rather attack the conform problem through greater cooperation among apps instead of piling everything into the NLE. I’d like to see more applications understand the edit in context, to reduce the need for round-tripping or conforming.

    It’d be great to have an industry-standard editorial XML spec so that all apps could read the same editorial file format and read from the same media. The NLE could cut; the coloring app could grade; the DAW could sweeten. Each tool could be able to access the edit decisions and add rendered clips which the NLE would use to replace the original clips for playout/compression. Each app could each add its own private set of tags to clips, and every other app could ignore (but preserve) any tags it didn’t understand.

    In other words, one single project file and one single media pool that all applications could work with. It’d be nice if everyone could get along, wouldn’t it?

    I think this could have actually worked, back when everyone used basically the same data model, prior to Apple forking editorial ideology.

    Back to the color board — there was some discussion on it in the FCP7 review by someone who likes FCPX [link] thread which you may find interesting.

    Walter Soyka
    Principal & Designer at Keen Live
    Motion Graphics, Widescreen Events, Presentation Design, and Consulting
    RenderBreak Blog – What I’m thinking when my workstation’s thinking
    Creative Cow Forum Host: Live & Stage Events

  • Marvin Holdman

    September 28, 2011 at 4:40 pm

    [Stu Maschwitz of RedGiant } – “I mean sure, dream up a better way—but it has to actually be better”

    Nailed it.

    Marvin Holdman
    Production Manager
    Tourist Network
    8317 Front Beach Rd, Suite 23
    Panama City Beach, Fl
    phone 850-234-2773 ext. 128
    cell 850-585-9667
    skype username – vidmarv

  • Simon Ubsdell

    September 28, 2011 at 6:00 pm

    A huge issue for me is that the “Color Board” ignores a fundamental principle of grading which is that luma and chroma are inter-related – adjust the luminance and you need to adjust the chroma to compensate. Hence the performance-enhancing value of a hardware interface where you can make both adjustments at the same time with trackballs.

    In the FCP7 3-way CC, for all its limitations, you could adjust lift/gamma/gain and saturation from the same pane (unlike the hideous Media Composer “Color Corrector”). FCPX requires you to tab between Color, Saturation and Exposure panes, greatly hampering the workflow.

    Simon Ubsdell
    Director/Editor/Writer
    http://www.tokyo-uk.com

  • Chris Harlan

    September 28, 2011 at 6:24 pm

    [Walter Soyka] “In other words, one single project file and one single media pool that all applications could work with. It’d be nice if everyone could get along, wouldn’t it?

    We were so close too. That is one of the most maddening things for me about this whole experience.The growing interoperability over the last few years was spectacular. FCS forced Avid to move so much closer to open standards. XML was really beginning to function extremely well across many borders. It seemed as if we were on the edge of de facto standards. Then, bam, somebody didn’t want to play anymore.

  • Michael Sacci

    September 28, 2011 at 7:04 pm

    The advancement of the integrated color was one of the things I was really excited about. I understand Apple’t thought behind all this stuff. It is so much better then what 3-way was. But I totally agree the way they implemented it just doesn’t make sense. As far as the controls all they did was give us something definitely and not as good. They also gave as 3 panels to work with whereas they could easily put all that on a single panel if they went with traditional color wheels and sliders. My biggest grip of FCP X is how real estate unfriendly the entire app is. It just doesn’t use the screen very well IMO, and this is most apparent with the color controls.

  • Morten

    September 28, 2011 at 7:04 pm

    And another issue with the bastard color board – why did key framing color effects disappear?

    – No Parking Production –

    2 x Finalcut Studio3, 2 x MacPro, 2 x ioHD, File Server w. X-Raid
    …. and FCPX in the garbage bin

Page 1 of 5

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy