Anniversaries, Names, Gravestones

[Craig Seeman]

[Franz Bieberkopf] “I believe Chris Harlan suggested the “The Editors’ Lounge”.”

Isn’t that trademarked?
https://www.editorslounge.com

I think COW would like a HOT title that would draw eyeballs.
They already have Platform Wars.
Looks like the armistice was signed though.
https://forums.creativecow.net/platformwars

I’d think something like
“Tag Team NLE Wrestling Bood Bath”
or
“My NLE’s Red Hot, Your’s ain’t Doodly Squat”
or more simply
“NLE Death Match”
or maybe more accurate
“Grumpy Old Men” (quick, find the last post made in this forum by a woman).

[Gary Huff]

[Franz Bieberkopf] “I suggest that a name change might be considered for the forum, to reflect both the shift in discussion (and the hope that it broadens further), and – perhaps more importantly – to rather dampen the temptation to invective that “The Debate” moniker may be contributing to, above and beyond its use as a lightning rod and beacon for exchange of information, data, views, and object graph management.”

…what is this, the like tenth time now this has been brought up?

[Chris Kenny]

[Craig Seeman] “I’d think something like
“Tag Team NLE Wrestling Bood Bath”
or
“My NLE’s Red Hot, Your’s ain’t Doodly Squat”
or more simply
“NLE Death Match”
or maybe more accurate
“Grumpy Old Men” (quick, find the last post made in this forum by a woman).”

Let’s just call it “Fight!”

—
Digital Workflow/Colorist, Nice Dissolve.

You should follow me on Twitter here. Or read our blog.

[Craig Seeman]

[Chris Kenny] “Let’s just call it “Fight!””

Or maybe we’re looking at this all wrong. We want the COW to get lots of eyeballs. Let’s thing about what works on YouTube.

“JKL Kittens purring on my keyboard”
says the guy with the cat avatar…

[Rafael Amador]

I suggest something more epic:
Quo Vadis Editor?
Rafael

[Julian Bowman]

Toys, prams and whining little b*****s.

[Steve Connor]

Same old, same old?

Steve Connor

There’s nothing we can’t argue about on the FCPX COW Forum

[Mark Dobson]

If it ain’t broke why fix it?

Still seems a pretty relevant title to me and it really compliments the FCPX Techniques Forum. Mostly the discussions are pretty considered and informative, the individuals who derive huge enjoyment from winding up others stick out a mile – or should I say individual?

What it allows is a more erudite view of where FCPX sits in the market. And yes it is slowly gaining more traction at the broadcast end of the spectrum.

[Herb Sevush]

[Mark Dobson] ” the individuals who derive huge enjoyment from winding up others stick out a mile – or should I say individual?”

No, you should definitely stick with the plural.

[Mark Dobson] “What it allows is a more erudite view of where FCPX sits in the market. And yes it is slowly gaining more traction at the broadcast end of the spectrum.”

I’m sure the Vegas and Edius editors would make the same claim with “slowly” and “more” being both ambiguous and irrelevant. For all his wild ranting the Mandy test initiated by Aindreas is unbiased and substantial.

Herb Sevush
Zebra Productions
—————————
nothin’ attached to nothin’
“Deciding the spine is the process of editing” F. Bieberkopf

[Mark Dobson]

[Herb Sevush] “I’m sure the Vegas and Edius editors would make the same claim with “slowly” and “more” being both ambiguous and irrelevant.”

Yeah, you are right, ‘slowly’ and ‘more’ are not most precise word to use.

However, I think that recent news from Craig Slattery that the BBCs flagship arts programme ‘The Culture Show’ is edited with FCPX is a sign that the software is making inroads into a marketplace that would have been hard to imagine 2 years ago.