Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums AJA Video Systems AJA Kona LHe with HDV (HDR-FX1) at overscan monitoring

  • AJA Kona LHe with HDV (HDR-FX1) at overscan monitoring

    Posted by Kaku Ito on December 5, 2005 at 8:11 am

    We found that with a tape that our customer brought in, capture it from FX1 via firewire at HDV preset in the FCP5, then monitoring the clip through Kona LHe and to JVC DT-V1910C through HDSDI connection would result in having a vertical line that seems to be reflecting from the right side of the clip.

    Did something like this happened to anyone here?

    This does not happen using the same tape, played on FX1, monitored on the same monitor connected via analog component signal.

    Kaku Ito
    http://www.creativesuite.com

    Kaku Ito replied 20 years, 5 months ago 2 Members · 2 Replies
  • 2 Replies
  • Gary Adcock

    December 5, 2005 at 2:30 pm

    [Kaku Ito] “from FX1 via firewire at HDV preset in the FCP5, then monitoring the clip through Kona LHe and to JVC DT-V1910C through HDSDI connection would result in having a vertical line that seems to be reflecting from the right side of the clip.”

    I have run to issues such as this when crossing SONY DV camera masters with decks from JVC. WHat does it do in a sony HDV deck?

    Gary Adcock
    Studio37
    HD and Film Consultation
    Chicago, IL USA

  • Kaku Ito

    December 5, 2005 at 2:46 pm

    Actually, it is happening on none crossing application. We tested with the tapes we shot with FX1, HC1, A1 and XLH1 and happened with every one of them.
    The vertical line appears on extreme right, and I found out it is outside of DVCPRO HD footage pixel area.
    We switch the clips back and force, using a piece of paper, hide the HDV clip except the last vertical line, then switch the clip to DVCPRO HD clip that is provided by AJA for demo purpose, the DVCPRO HD clip’s edge does not reach the same pixel area.
    So, I guess it is not so much problem, it’s outside of underscan anyway. But we might have to watch out when we rescale the size for PINP. Maybe this is something to do with some conpensation for pixel ratio or anamorphic picture ratio?

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy