Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy After Effects vs. Final Cut

  • After Effects vs. Final Cut

    Posted by Todd Tennant on October 15, 2008 at 6:46 pm

    Can I do all (or most) of the same type of things with Final Cut that I could with After Effects?
    I can only get one of these apps and need to make a decision soon.
    Any in put will be gratefully accepted and considered.

    T

    Lance Fallon replied 16 years, 10 months ago 9 Members · 16 Replies
  • 16 Replies
  • Bill Dewald

    October 15, 2008 at 7:46 pm

    They are two very different programs – Final Cut Pro is video editing software, After Effects is compositing software.

    Final Cut Pro is a part of Final Cut Studio, which is only sold as a bundle. With FCS you also get Motion, which is compositing software like After Effects.

    After Effects is sold separately, but also comes as part of the Adobe CS bundle, which includes the video editing software Premiere.

    So, do you need to edit video, or do you need to composite video?

  • Richard Sanchez

    October 15, 2008 at 7:47 pm

    Not at all. Final Cut is an editing application, After Effects is motion graphics and compositing. You can do basic compositing in Final Cut, but nothing near as advanced as with After Effects, but you can’t really edit in After Effects (you could try but you’d want to kill yourself). You also can’t lay back to tape with After Effects.

    If you want to edit, get Final Cut, if you want to composite, get After Effects. With FCS2 you’ll motion, which is close for basic motion graphics, and has great templates and ready to go material, but for really advanced compositing, After Effects is king.

    Richard Sanchez
    North Hollywood, CA

    “We are the facilitators of our own creative evolution.” – Bill Hicks

  • Jamie Pickell

    October 15, 2008 at 7:54 pm

    Todd,

    It depends on what you are doing. If you are primarily editing, then you want Final Cut Pro which comes with Motion (which is somewhat similar to After Effects). If you are primarily doing motion graphics, then you should get After Effects. If you do get After Effects, spend the money and get the Adobe Production Premium which comes with After Effects, Photoshop, Illustrator, Premiere, Flash, Soundbooth and Encore. Basically it comes down to this: decide what primarily you plan on doing and go with that toolset.

    Jamie
    OS 10.5.5
    FCP 6.04
    2×3.2 Quad-Core
    Kona 3
    XRaid

  • Todd Tennant

    October 15, 2008 at 8:25 pm

    Thanks to you and everyone else who replied. I need to do both compositing and editing & will eventually purchase both apps.

    Just so everyone knows; the term “3D graphics and animation with Motion” from the Final Cut web page
    is what compelled me to ask this question in the first place. I see now from your replies that though that may be similar to AE, it would allow me to do all I could with AE (which is what I had suspected, but was not sure of).

    T

  • Todd Tennant

    October 15, 2008 at 8:48 pm

    Right now, I am stuck mostly in 2D but want to break out into the world of 3D as you all have.
    I would like to:

    a) improve my 3D fly-overs/walk-thru animations for my architectural clients
    with added quality and effects (https://tinyurl.com/3umatr)…

    b) get into 3D animated graphics commercials for my advertising clients…

    c) and for me, to be able to make animated versions of my graphic novels
    and story-board ideas as seen here:
    https://tinyurl.com/fn3pm
    https://tinyurl.com/5n87rk

    T

  • Todd Tennant

    October 15, 2008 at 10:39 pm

    That last sentence was SUPPOSED to say:

    “I see now from your replies that though that may be similar to AE, it would NOT allow me to do all I could with AE (which is what I had suspected, but was not sure of).

    Sorry about that.

    T

  • Walter Biscardi

    October 16, 2008 at 2:47 am

    As the others have noted, they are not remotely the same.

    If you need to perform video editing, Final Cut Pro.

    If you need to perform motion graphics, compositing and special effects, After Effects.

    We use both everyday as both tools are necessary to complete our projects along with Photoshop. In Final Cut Pro I’ve created comps up to 25 video tracks. In After Effects we regularly go over 100 layers of material and I’ve used up to 950 layers of material in especially complex pieces.

    Walter Biscardi, Jr.
    Biscardi Creative Media
    HD and SD Production for Broadcast and Independent Productions.

    Read my Blog!

    STOP STARING AND START GRADING WITH APPLE COLOR Apple Color Training DVD available now!

  • Chris Poisson

    October 16, 2008 at 3:23 pm

    Todd,

    In the short term, you’d get better results with FC2. Why? Motion is pretty good, and pretty easy to learn, plus, you’d be getting FCP so you could edit too. After Effects, while incredibly great, is equally complex, and the learning curve can be considerable.

    Have a wonderful day.

  • Todd Tennant

    October 18, 2008 at 7:50 pm

    I went with the consensus and just ordered Adobe After Effects.

    All the tutorials I’ve seen here look great, but which would you
    recommend I study first for the quickest “kick-start” (both free and to purchase)?

    Thanks again, everyone,

    Todd

  • Chris Poisson

    October 22, 2008 at 3:23 pm

    I think the Adobe Classroom in a Book is still the best for beginners, but if you can afford the Total Training DVDs get them.

    Have a wonderful day.

Page 1 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy