Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

  • Steve Connor

    April 23, 2017 at 6:49 pm

    [andy patterson] “I have not used FCPX in a couple of years. The last I knew the titling tool in FCPX’s titling system did not have any drawing tools. I don’t think the 3-D titling tool uses ray-tracing but imitation 3-D instead. Create a metal hexagon in FCPX’s titling tool and make a glass title slide in front of the chrome hexagon and post the result here on the cow.”

    Not having drawing tools doesn’t mean it “sucks ass”

  • Robin S. kurz

    April 24, 2017 at 7:15 am

    [Scott Witthaus] “In my opinion only, of course.”

    Not only yours, believe me.

    Yeah, FCP’s “titling tool” (which is in fact Motion, but never mind ????) needs more work… ???? Hilarious.

  • Robin S. kurz

    April 24, 2017 at 7:55 am

    [Morten Ranmar] “super essential … 3D text”

    Super essential? Probably not for everyone. But most certainly very popular, fast, high-quality and extremely practical, yes.

    – RK

    ____________________________________________________
    Deutsch? Hier gibt es ein umfassendes FCP X Training für dich!

  • Morten

    April 24, 2017 at 8:28 am

    Guess my sarcasm wasn’t all too clear ; )

    – No Parking Production –

    Adobe CC2014, 3 x MacPro, 3 x MbP, Ethernet File Server w. Areca ThunderRaid 8

  • Robin S. kurz

    April 24, 2017 at 8:40 am

    [Morten Ranmar] “Guess my sarcasm wasn’t all too clear”

    Oh, it was. Not to worry.

    But hey, you should try Premiere’s “3D text” sometime! I’d say that’s not just RAYTRACED, but it also includes some serious ambient occlusion!! ????????

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fuJM4sV6398

    Yeah, BOY does FCP’s 3D text suck big time in comparison!! I’m SO jealous.

    – RK

    ____________________________________________________
    Deutsch? Hier gibt es ein umfassendes FCP X Training für dich!

  • Tony West

    April 24, 2017 at 11:31 am

    [andy patterson] ” FCPX’s titling tool sucks ass. “

    How did THIS comment not get flagged by Tim.

    I’ve seen a lot less not get through.

  • Robin S. kurz

    April 24, 2017 at 11:34 am

    [Tony West] “How did THIS comment not get flagged by Tim.”

    Yeah, no kiddin’.
    The troll-o-meter should have tilted (long ago). Not sure how that could have gone unnoticed. I’ve been chastised for FAR less in the past. Go figger. ????

    – RK

  • Scott Witthaus

    April 24, 2017 at 12:13 pm

    [Bill Davis] “but I STILL can’t see the 3D camel”

    It’s a lizard, not a camel! At least that’s what I saw last night….

    Scott Witthaus
    Owner, 1708 Inc./Editorial
    Managing Partner, Low Country Creative LLC
    Professor, VCU Brandcenter

  • Robin S. kurz

    April 24, 2017 at 3:00 pm

    [Steve Connor] “Have you USED FCPX Andy?”

    You seriously feel you have to ask? ????

  • Jeremy Garchow

    April 24, 2017 at 5:11 pm

    [andy patterson] “I have yet to see anyone create a metal object (hexagon) with FCPX’s titling tool and have a glass title pass in front of it.”

    Did this very quick only using FCPX, but is this what you are talking about?

    11292_thisisglass.mp4.zip

Page 4 of 7

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy