-
Achieving the perfect “frame-within-a-frame”
Hey Cows,
It’s my first post here! I’ve been reading for years and finally decided to make an account. My question(s) today comes for an online news show workflow, where I cut from hosts on-camera with a side window graphic (frequently the main subject’s face) to various photo & video assets. Soooo…
1. Does anyone know how to make a special Nest-type* object that can sub a smaller asset (frame within a frame) and keep everything confined to those motion properties (Position & Scale) of that original Nest*? I wanna make the smaller graphic moving, like slowly zooming in or out, but staying within the confines and exact position of the original object. Digital zoom in, but the image remains 640×480 (or whatever it is) inside our overall 1920×1080 YouTube framing, in the same spot. We achieve the desired effect with after Effects for motion, or Photoshop for simple static, then dropping previous motion assets from an old template onto them. I’m hoping there’s a way I can do this Premiere by using a nest, or multicam, or something else I have yet to discover. Right now I’m taking images and videos of varying sizes then individually (…repeatedly…) compressing down to the specific size with Ps or AE, then importing… but I’m guessing there’s a shorthand to achieve the same effect immediately within Premiere. Any ideas?
2. Slightly related, at least in my use… but is there way to ‘Scale to Frame Size,’ but according to the smaller dimensions? Let’s say I have a very tall image… for my show’s workflow, I’d motion track a Y-axis move, but since the image needs to cover the screen I first need to scale it up to fill the entire screen… not just frame size, or else there’s bottom layers spilling out on the sides. Ya know what I mean? It might not sound like much extra work, but with 15-20 images per video and 6-7 videos per day… those clicks can really add up!
I have yet to explore any user-built plug-ins / mods for Premiere and think the answer to #2 above is likely such. I’m sure there’s a bunch of places to find these gems, but if you happen to have any favorites and are responding already, I’d love to know your go-to!
Thanks, gang!
Brendan