-
About to make the HPX300 leap… HELP!
Hey all,
I own a small video production business in northern California, and for years I’ve been getting buy on my DVX100Bs. I’m making the plunge into HD with the HPX300.
I have a few questions for those with more expertise than I can muster. For while on projects I’ve been using a HVX200 with a lens adapter and Nikon lenses. I’m happy with the images, but the light loss is significant.
I’ve talked to some people said buying the HPX300, removing the stock lens and using a $75 lens mount to put on Nikons is a workable way to get good, inexpensive depth of field. The drawback is no zoom. The advantage is not the loss of light. The savings is $2000 or so in a lens adapter and all that comes with that, which also sounds good to me.
My question is… does this sound right? Do I have my facts in order? Does this sound like a workable solution to get a good depth of field at a reasonable price on this camera (with the understanding I’ll need to move the camera via dolly whenever I want to ‘zoom’ in).
As some context, I’ll be buying a Chrosziel R20-HPX300K2 Panasonic HPX-300 with Kit 2 (AC-CMB-R20-HPXK2) for use when the Nikon lenses are affixed.
Finally, can anyone recommend a good lens mount for the HPX300 to affix the Nikon lenses? An associate already has Nikon lenses, so…
Thanks in advance,
Chris