-
A Somewhat Unique Situation
Greetings,
I have a gig editing, encoding, and managing educational content for an online company. In the past, I’ve handled this work by editing and storing the company’s content on an internal RAID 0 that I backed up using firewire drives stored offsite. This is a terrible workflow, and the company has expanded to the point where the amount of footage being produced this year has more than tripled, so my 6 TB internal RAID 0 will no longer hold a year’s worth of footage.
I am estimating that they will produce roughly 15 TB this year, including all associated project files. It’s all standard def, usually delivered tapeless, and the editing is very rudimentary, a few edits per hour of footage. Most of the job is encoding, making DVD’s, uploading, etc. Once more, the footage is only “good” for a year, so long term archiving beyond that is not important.
I’m looking for a better workflow. These files get shipped to me daily in 100-200 gig batches. 95% of the time, I edit, encode, upload .mp4’s to a server, make DVD’s, and I’m done with those particular files forever. Once in a while they might want to do some re-editing a month later, or an encode gets corrupted, and I need to re-output, but these are rare occasions.
At 15 TB, it seems like a high performance RAID solution holding all of those files would be especially expensive and unnecessary. I don’t need constant access to all of these files at once, since 95% will never be revisited after DVD’s have been burned and web files had been uploaded.
Are there lower cost “backup” RAID solutions that offer lower performance without sacrificing security ? Are they cheap enough that I could purchase two, using one as a backup that I move offsite?
Are there other backup solutions that could be paired with some sort of RAID?
Sorry if I’m rambling, but this job is an odd combination for me: extremely modest editing/performance requirements coupled with extremely high storage requirements.
I’d like to spend no more than $5000-$6000, but that may prove unrealistic.
Thanks for your input,
Ed