Meh, as they say its a “push”.
The webster is an idiot not to state up front that he charges for consults and how much. You expect a lawyer to charge for every call and discussion, and they’ll tell you, up front, if and how they do. Since he didn’t inform you what parts of your conversation were “on the clock”, and your email trail doesn’t have a specific order or agreement on it (does it?) I don’t think he’s got a case to make you pay, especially since he didn’t AFAIK TELL you anything specific that you could use to then do the job without him. So if I call the Chevy dealer to ask about the price for a car with so-and-so package on it, I’m liable to buy it because he spent some time looking up stuff in the catalog? PLEASE! He can’t arbitrarily charge you for his “research time” until later, when he bills for the completed work. (AKA “Dealer Prep”) Not unless you had another understanding up front.
He’s doubly an idiot for acting this way, because he doesn’t lose his knowledge just by sharing some of it, and conversations like this are what lead to actual customer deals, if not now, usually later. “Bob, what’s the name of that guy, you know, that gave us the advice about the dynamically updating RSS feed thing? Yeah, he’s good, call him about this new gig, see if he can take it”.
If we got charged every time we asked a vendor a few preliminary product research or application questions, we’d have no money to actually buy products or services.
That said, we know it is bad form to ask for them to research a complete package down to the last detail, just to give that info away in open bidding process or use their report as a shopping list to buy each piece somewhere ourselves. It is a delicate balance; the vendor spends a certain amount of effort and expertise to lay the groundwork for what might evolve into a deal. That’s his gamble, his investment, and he has to decide how hard to work on the proposal before it’s wasted time. That’s part of being a salesman, not every pitch gets closed. Most of the time it IS a waste, but it leads to a deal often enough that its worth doing again and again.
It is not fair to lead him on with false promises you’re ready to buy, if it’s just an inquiry. It wastes both your time and his, and destroys the working relationship. Have the guts to say: “This is for informational purposes only right now, but if we move ahead to a bidding/ buying situation we’ll let you know”.
A proposal is not a deal, its a description of a deal’s elements and asking for the deal. I can “propose” marriage to Jessica Alba but she’s not under legal compulsion to take me up on it, even if I researched where to go on the honeymnoon. (Well, the restraining order issue too, but that’s not germane to my argument)
This is why its important to establish the boundaries up front when you transact for data, just as you do for a physical purchase.
Back to the webhead: seems like he’s trying to bill you for something the previous client already paid for. He already did the “research” part when he built the previous site, if you’re asking for a clone of the other site.
His actual expenses would be his time to make the adaptations and customizations, the extra licenses if needed, sure, but it’s not like somebody erased his memory of the past year after he completed the prior job
( “Paycheck”, starring Uma Thurman and Ben Affleck, actually a pretty good underrated movie for video nerds, you’ll enjoy the first 30 minutes in particular)
and he’ll have to re-discover all the software tools again…
I don’t accept his claims of proprietary trade secrets too much either. Yes, he’s not obligated to tell you how he builds the clock, just to tell you what time it is. Unless you’re specifically paying him extra to teach you the tricks along the way. But come ON, he admits half the thing is off-the-shelf software, the other half is custom code, but the off the shelf stuff is a state secret? That’s dumb. Its the custom code and integration that makes the deal. Like saying I can’t tell you what NLE I used to make your video?!?!?
Maybe a closer analogy would be, you created a card flip or spinning video cube effect template in Aftereffects for one project. Took you five hours to build it, but it’s saved as a template, and the first client cares not if you re-use it as-is. Another client wants the exact effect, maybe to use in a parody of the first spot, but with his own footage applied. That’s probably a one hour job in comparison, to just add the new footage to the old template and hit the render button, but are you really going to bill him for the five hours again, as if you had to re-construct the thing from scratch? Shame on you if you do. Such skills and assets are part of the package when you book me, that’s WHY you book me, because I’ve built up skills and experience and a bag of tricks that gets it done better and faster. Every client gets the benefit of what I’ve learned on the projects before him.