Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums DaVinci Resolve 4000 vs fx 4800 vs 285

  • 4000 vs fx 4800 vs 285

    Posted by Rick Turners on January 25, 2011 at 11:57 am

    Does anyone have performance results for these cards?

    We are choosing between the 4000 and 4800 (as the 285 is unavailable outside the US)

    Is the 4800 worth the extra $1k?

    Margus Voll replied 15 years, 3 months ago 5 Members · 7 Replies
  • 7 Replies
  • Rick Turners

    January 25, 2011 at 12:03 pm

    Oh, we had the 8800 laying around, but from what I hear it does not support Cuda on mac?

  • Sascha Haber

    January 25, 2011 at 12:36 pm

    I have the 285 and its like 20% faster than the 4800.
    The 4000 is even slower, but only uses one slot, you can add a 285 for processing AND then you have a good card for Premiere or anything else too.
    Requires modding the power cable though 🙂
    Cheap solution : ebay 285 (paypal) plus GT120 appleshop
    Smartest solution : Dual Quadro 4000, 2000 bucks, great processing, fast UI
    Best solution : Quadro 4000 plus Cubix

    A slice of color…

    DaVinci 7.1 OSX 10.6.6
    Dual Xeon 2,4 RAM 24 GB
    RAID0 8TB eSata 6TB
    GTX 285 / GT 120
    Extreme 3D+ WAVE

  • Rick Turners

    January 25, 2011 at 12:46 pm

    I suppose we could get a 4000 and when more processing power is needed get another 4000.

    Although the second 4000 would not affect processing speeds? only UI quickness?

  • Margus Voll

    January 25, 2011 at 1:52 pm

    depends how you use your 4000.

    i would put both 4000 to cubix and have 120 for gui.

    Margus

    https://iconstudios.eu

  • Darren Mostyn

    January 25, 2011 at 9:17 pm

    Not sure how to measure it really as I only have the 4800. I have just graded a 90 minute HD (ProRes and DVCProHD, over 700 scenes for a BBC documentary. At least 3 nodes on each scene and up to 7, 8, 9 at times, including blur, sharpen etc but no more nodes than 9. I didn’t get real time throughout but most of the time it was real time and certainly the Director and I were very impressed with the performance!
    However, Stability was the real surprise. The system was ROCK SOLID! V7.1,
    Can’t compare to the others, but glad I bought the 4800!

    Post Production in Brighton
    Follow us @onlinecreative
    http://www.online-creative.com

  • Erik Lindahl

    January 26, 2011 at 4:30 pm

    Would DaVinci benifit from 2x Quadro 4000 cards vs 1x Quadro 4000 + 1x GT120, both placed in the comp?

    One of the Quadro’s would drive the GUI of course.

    ————————
    Erik Lindahl
    Freecloud Post Production Services
    http://www.freecloud.se

  • Margus Voll

    January 27, 2011 at 6:33 pm

    i soo no big difference. correct me if i’m wrong.

    i wonder how it compares to have 3 x 4000 and rocket in extender or just have two 285 ?

    Margus

    https://iconstudios.eu

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy