2005-fcp 5, 2012-fcpX

[Steve Connor]

[Aindreas Gallagher] “I’ll take any word from an avid guy, but as far as I’m aware, no other editing system on the planet has these kinds of live mastering abilities in the timeline.

it goes to CC as well. in some respects FCPX is simply show stoppingly powerful.
“

Steady Aindreas “X Gon’ give it to ya”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGx6K90TmCI

Steve Connor
‘It’s just my opinion, with an occasional fact thrown in for good measure”

Some contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!

This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Google Youtube” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.

[Simon Ubsdell]

[craig slattery] “Plus the new black Comedy by British director Dan Wheatley, Sightseers. “

I’m sure it’s a great programme you’ve cut – but the director of Sightseers is Ben Wheatley.

Not “Dan”.

Simon Ubsdell
http://www.tokyo-uk.com

[Shawn Miller]

[Aindreas Gallagher] “…but as far as I’m aware, no other editing system on the planet has these kinds of live audio mastering abilities in the timeline.”

Sony Vegas does… and has had these kinds of capabilities for years. I’ve known people who have recorded and mixed entire albums with it.

https://www.sonycreativesoftware.com/vegaspro/audioproduction

Shawn

[Craig Slattery]

Thanks Simon, school boy error. Thankfully only on this post.

[Simon Ubsdell]

[craig slattery] “Thanks Simon, school boy error. Thankfully only on this post.”

I only mention it because he’s the most exciting director working in the UK today – Kill List is essential viewing, as is Sightseers.

Simon Ubsdell
http://www.tokyo-uk.com

[Aindreas Gallagher]

good tune there steve, and hey – I’m on record liking a lot here –

but devils advocate aside, which I like – trust this white board apple engineer scribbled over mess as a core editing system?

nay, son.

Nay.

Apple are capricious dance partners. and they burnt a million bridges across london with X. I have to learn Avid, not FCPX.

https://vimeo.com/user1590967/videos http://www.ogallchoir.net promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics

[Franz Bieberkopf]

[Aindreas Gallagher] “that said the FCPX waveform itself is vector simplified unusable trash.”

Aindreas,

I thought this was settled a while back – they’re not waveforms, they’re audiographs. Old habits die hard.

Franz.

[Aindreas Gallagher]

sure god, franz, would you like to expand please?

I didn’t even know the apple basis until I took the phrase to google.

https://zerokidz.com/audiograph/Home.html

the thing i am most curious about – is hearing someone tell me how they stitch audio network library pieces together in FCPX.

how are you supposed to work that waveform crud for chorus bar repeat stuff where you’re re-working a track for time?

we all know that waveform is nearly unusable – why exactly in the hell is no one really saying this?

https://vimeo.com/user1590967/videos http://www.ogallchoir.net promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics

[Steve Connor]

Because it’s not unusable at all, been stitching away happily with it for a while!

Steve Connor
‘It’s just my opinion, with an occasional fact thrown in for good measure”

[Charlie Austin]

[Aindreas Gallagher] “we all know that waveform is nearly unusable – why exactly in the hell is no one really saying this?”

Because, as Steve said, it’s not unusable. In fact, editing audio in X is pretty damn awesome. Being able to manipulate stuff down to the sample level is really nice. I can cut music and frankenstein dialog bits together better than I ever could in 7.

————————————————————-

~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~