Activity › Forums › Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy › 16×9 Anamorphic to 4×3 letterboxed without leavinf FCP 5.1.1?
-
16×9 Anamorphic to 4×3 letterboxed without leavinf FCP 5.1.1?
Posted by Warren Eig on August 31, 2006 at 4:14 pmIs there a way to take a Anamorphic 16×9 program and output a 4×3 letterboxed version to tape through FCP? I exported to compressor and did a conversion there but it jitters as if there is a field issue introduced.
Any ideas or suggestions?
TIA,
Warren
__
Warren Eig
<wa****@**************es.com>
http://www.babyboompictures.com
O 310-470-0905John Steventon replied 19 years, 8 months ago 5 Members · 5 Replies -
5 Replies
-
John Steventon
August 31, 2006 at 4:44 pmExport a quicktime, or a quicktime reference of the programme, re-import it, stick it onto a 4:3 timeline (but don’t change either of the properties things to Anamorphic) and it should play back as letterbox.
Remember to look at the half line at the top of the letterboxed pitcture. If it’s flickering away (or even noticeable), crop it off.
Hope this helped.
John
John
Success is merely a failiure to imagine more…G5 2.7Ghz, 4.5Gb ram, Blackmagic Decklink/multibridge, 5.6Tb Infortrend storage, FCP Studio 5.02, Makie MCU control, Yahama 5.1 surround, JVC DTV multi-format monitor, 2x23inch Apple monitors – and a partirdge on a pear tree.
-
Zak Mussig
August 31, 2006 at 5:00 pmWarren,
You can do essentially what John suggested without having to export out of and import back into Final Cut. Nest your 16×9 sequence in a new 4×3 sequence with whatever settings you like (as Borjis suggested). You’ll have to render before exporting to tape, but you never have to leave FCP, and everything is contained within your project file with no QT files to keep track of later.
This technique can be used any time you want to change your output format. I will mention though, that if your project si going to DVD, you should just export your m2v file in 16×9, and set its display mode in DVDSP to letterbox.Hope that helps,
Zak -
Captain Mench
August 31, 2006 at 5:09 pmI’d just drop it in the 4:3 sequence. No need to export and no need to “nest” but ‘nest’ the sequences by dragging the 16:9 sequence into a new 4:3 sequence… I guess that’s called nesting too.
Anyway — might want to check this out as it will show you some of the steps:https://www.proapptips.com/proapptipsvideotutorials/879F6B61-CFF9-4FD1-8D43-FDF89605611A/6ECEC931-47F1-4BC1-8CD4-41FE4842B45D.html
Good luck,
CaptM
-
John Steventon
September 1, 2006 at 12:14 pmHey folks,
Yeah – sorry – I meant to add that the reason I export the QT first (well, two reasons) are 1) That my system oddly loses media from time to time, or forgeets about audio keyframes etc, so if I’ve got a final edit that I know I won’t change, and everything is perfect (yeah, right!) with the programme, I have a master quicktime of it on the Raid that cannot change. The other reason is similar. If you next the sequence, it does give you the option of tweaking the edit if you need to change things – but it ALSO provides the danger of accidentally tweaking the wrong sequence, coming back to your nested edit, and find everything’s changed!!
Only really applies if you have multiple versions of the same sequence at any one time (which i often have), but I thought I’d let you know why I export a QT (and always a self-contained one) for that purpose.
Have a good weekend.
John
Success is merely a failiure to imagine more…G5 2.7Ghz, 4.5Gb ram, Blackmagic Decklink/multibridge, 5.6Tb Infortrend storage, FCP Studio 5.02, Makie MCU control, Yahama 5.1 surround, JVC DTV multi-format monitor, 2x23inch Apple monitors – and a partirdge on a pear tree.
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up