Activity › Forums › Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy › 1080i29.97 downconvert to SD. Upper to Lower field?
-
1080i29.97 downconvert to SD. Upper to Lower field?
Keetat Tan replied 15 years, 4 months ago 4 Members · 17 Replies
-
Matt Campbell
December 16, 2010 at 9:33 pmyeah i thought about that and am actually in the process of changing it now. thx
smore’s rule. spot should air soon. keep an eye out for a composite decking spot.
OS 10.6.3, Mac Pro 2 x 2.66 ghz quad-core intel xenon, 16 gb ram, with BM Intensity Pro card
-
Keetat Tan
December 21, 2010 at 7:35 amI would use none and change the sequence setting to none as well. This will hemp with the supers at the end. The footage should look fine except when there is a horizontal pan, which will look a bit jittery.
Hope this helps -
Matt Campbell
December 21, 2010 at 3:34 pmI’ve already resolved this but thanks for your reply. question, why would you use none? this is a downconversion to Standard Def 29.97 for broadcast, which is interlaced, lower field first. None would be for a progressive sequence, which neither of these are.
OS 10.6.3, Mac Pro 2 x 2.66 ghz quad-core intel xenon, 16 gb ram, with BM Intensity Pro card
-
David Roth weiss
December 21, 2010 at 4:59 pmI agree with Jeremy…
BTW Matt, if the spot is reduced in size by 50% or more when it goes on the Web that will essentially deinterlace it.
David Roth Weiss
Director/Editor/Colorist
David Weiss Productions, Inc.
Los Angeles
https://www.drwfilms.comPOST-PRODUCTION WITHOUT THE USUAL INSANITY ™
A forum host of Creative COW’s Business & Marketing and Apple Final Cut Pro forums. Formerly host of the Apple Final Cut Basics, Indie Film & Documentary, and Film History & Appreciations forums.
-
Keetat Tan
December 27, 2010 at 8:06 amSorry about that, carelessness on my part. we use none when it’s a full graphics so I thought it might work with yours as well.
Panning is still a problem, and we usually add in a motion blur for it.Cheers
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up