-
10.3.2 Is out – WOW review from a huge X facility in Europe.
-
[Oliver Peters] “PS: also true. However, most of this doesn’t translate correctly anyway, even with an XML. So you end up rebuilding, no matter what.”
It doesn’t with xmeml, but fcpxml translations to Resolve are spot on in terms of speed. I think this has to do with Resolve having very similar mechanics, but still, as mentioned before, the speed change translations to and from Resolve 12 are usually very seamless.
We shoot a lot of off speed from 180 – 3000 fps, and use speed ramps fairly often and the workflow between Resolve and X is really very good.
I don’t think that Pr’s version of xmeml is as robust as FCP 7 was. I, too, have weird issues when going to xmeml. This is another reason I like fcpxml over xmeml, because when the two apps use fcpxml, the translation is very accurate. Xmeml was never very good at speed change translations.
-
[Jeremy Garchow] “but fcpxml translations to Resolve are spot on in terms of speed”
Agreed.
– Oliver
Oliver Peters Post Production Services, LLC
Orlando, FL
http://www.oliverpeters.com -
[Steve Connor] “Hope you enjoyed “The Roast of Bill Davis” :)”
Sounds lik a perfectly awful menu item!
This beefy dish is presented seriously overcooked in a simmering broth of hyperbole – with way too much spice – and a thick, all too developed semi teflon-like skin.
Order something else.
Seriously.
Creator of XinTwo – https://www.xintwo.com
The shortest path to FCP X mastery. -
[Andrew Kimery] “That sword swings both ways in here.”
Absolutely.
When you have a sword swung AT you enough – it’s traditional to learn to parry and swing one right back.
If somebody “jumps the topic” of a thread away from a noted positive development in one software camp – in order merely to point out a “non-related balancing deficiency” in response – explain please why it suddenly becomes inappropriate for me to do the exact same thing?
I’ll wait.
Creator of XinTwo – https://www.xintwo.com
The shortest path to FCP X mastery. -
[Bill Davis] “When you have a sword swung AT you enough – it’s traditional to learn to parry and swing one right back.
If somebody “jumps the topic” of a thread away from a noted positive development in one software camp – in order merely to point out a “non-related balancing deficiency” in response – explain please why it suddenly becomes inappropriate for me to do the exact same thing?”
The figurative sword isn’t being swung at YOU, it’s being swung at FCP X. And unlike an actual sword being swung at someone in real life, figurative swords on the Internet don’t require a reaction. On the Interent not engaging in behavior you don’t like is as easy as choosing to not engage in behavior that you don’t like. Lead by example. Engage in the conduct you would LIKE to see in the forum instead of the conduct you DISLIKE seeing in the forum. Follow the Golden Rule.
I never said it was inappropriate for you to do the exact thing. I was pointing out that its hypocritical for you to complain about people doing XYZ when you yourself do XYZ. If you want to swing swords then by all means swing swords. Just don’t complain about the sword fights while you perpetuate them.
Eye for an eye and we all go blind and all that…
If you post something cool about X and someone craps on X for something completely unrelated then just politely remind the person that this thread is about cool and if they want to talk about crap then they can start their own thread talking about crap. If the talk about crap continues then I’m sure you can ask Tim if he can spin crap off into its own thread since it has nothing to do with cool. I know we are the kings of branching discussions in here, but I think it’s fine for the thread starter to ask for completely unrelated discussions to get spun off into their own threads.
I try not to derail threads like that, though I’m sure I have in the past because I’m not perfect, but I’ll be more mindful of it going forward. It is lame to post something cool, and then have someone else drop in something completely unrelated and negative just because they want to be negative. If we make a better effort to curb such behavior (such has having those comments spun off into their own threads) then it will probably wither and die because we are denying the thread bomber their ability to thread bomb.
Just my 2 cents.
-
Oliver, those problems could be a Resolve issue, not an FCP X issue. My 2 cents.
-
[Brian Seegmiller] “Oliver, those problems could be a Resolve issue, not an FCP X issue. My 2 cents.”
Which specific problems? Because part of what I mentioned wasn’t with Resolve but with XtoCC. It’s hard to follow the threading here.
Oliver
Oliver Peters Post Production Services, LLC
Orlando, FL
http://www.oliverpeters.com -
[Oliver Peters] “It’s hard to follow the threading here.
“Start a new one?
-
[Andrew Kimery] “The figurative sword isn’t being swung at YOU, it’s being swung at FCP X.”
Oh excuse me?
THIS….
“I suspect part of Herb’s snark is in that you purposefully left off Mads last line about the performance improvement in the timeline”
…is pretty much YOU swinging your own invented “purposefully” word-sword directly at ME – after jumping to an incorrect assumption.
Excuse me if I have a bit of trouble, Andrew, with your about face and sudden quest to don the mantle of the wise neutral arbiter is this.
Ceasars wife, you ain’t.
Creator of XinTwo – https://www.xintwo.com
The shortest path to FCP X mastery. -
[Bill Davis] “…is pretty much YOU swinging your own invented “purposefully” word-sword directly at ME – after jumping to an incorrect assumption.”
Once you finally clarified that you were quoting an older, private communication with Mads and not the public posting by Mads that all of us were referencing I thanked you for the clarification because it’s not my intent put words in peoples’ mouths or misattribute things.
How was anyone but YOU to know that Mads said something to you in private and then said the EXACT same thing in public with the additional comment of “Now we are actually ABLE to work in the timeline. Now the snappiness of FCPX also applies to us.”? Everyone thought you were cherry picking Mads quote from FCP.co. It’s not like it’s beyond you to paint FCP X in an overly rosy light.
Again, you can act any way you please, but don’t complain about the actions of others when you do the same thing yourself (and don’t complain even more when your hypocrisy gets pointed out). Just own your actions and go with it.
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up