-
10.3.2 Is out – WOW review from a huge X facility in Europe.
-
[Scott Witthaus] “Logic seemingly sit in the background”
Logic just received a big update.
Oliver
Oliver Peters Post Production Services, LLC
Orlando, FL
http://www.oliverpeters.com -
[Bill Davis] “Its just that NOT waiting for traditional stuff like that is likely why the X team has managed to keep the innovation flowing with stuff like the deep Roles re-build in 10.3.”
But you made this same argument for why it wasn’t important to do the Roles re-build – in fact you’ve made this same argument every time anyone, anywhere, asked for any changes to X “your just stuck in the old ways, I want the developers to push forward.”
Maybe pushing forward is building an innovative way to handle sync indicators that was never seen before, and this new capability will be useful in ways you’ve never thought of. For someone so happy to reach for the new you act like someone afraid to leave hold of what you have – the new you are now protecting is so yesterday.
Herb Sevush
Zebra Productions
—————————
nothin\’ attached to nothin\’
\”Deciding the spine is the process of editing\” F. Bieberkopf -
[Oliver Peters] “[Scott Witthaus] “Logic seemingly sit in the background”
Logic just received a big update.”
I was talking more about marketing. Logic is a ProTools competitor (on some levels) and Motion is an AE competitor (on some levels). Why not make them work together better and market the hell out of them?
Scott Witthaus
Senior Editor/Post Production Supervisor
1708 Inc./Editorial
Professor, VCU Brandcenter -
So where does this review apppear? I get no recent posts by the author turning up in google searches? Then again Google appears to hate on me from time time.
-
[Scott Witthaus] “Why not make them work together better and market the hell out of them?”
You must be confusing Apple with the other “A” companies. ☺
– Oliver
Oliver Peters Post Production Services, LLC
Orlando, FL
http://www.oliverpeters.com -
No reviews. Go to the first comment at the bottom of this article.
– Oliver
Oliver Peters Post Production Services, LLC
Orlando, FL
http://www.oliverpeters.com -
[Oliver Peters] “You must be confusing Apple with the other “A” companies. ☺
– Oliver”
Aaah yes the other A***.
I just spent a week trying to get a dongle to work.
Maybe that other A*** should use Apples Cloud licensing option next time around ☺
I know off topic but I felt left out 😉
-
[Bill Davis] “”I kid you not when I say this this, for us at Metronome and basically anyone who works with FCPX in the pro television industry, doing shows/long-form projects, also including anyone cutting feature films, FCPX 10.3.2 is one of the most, if not the most important release of FCPX, ever since the initial launch.””
Funny how you cut the quote off at this point. I think I’ll remedy that by finishing the quote –
“Even surpassing 10.3. Now we are actually ABLE to work in the timeline. Now the snappiness of FCPX also applies to us.”
WOW, they can now actually “work in the timeline.” What an advance in NLE software design, what was I thinking of ever using anything else. So according to one of it’s better known proponents it’s taken 5 years for X to be suitable for long form work. Well, I guess that is progress.
Herb Sevush
Zebra Productions
—————————
nothin\’ attached to nothin\’
\”Deciding the spine is the process of editing\” F. Bieberkopf -
[Herb Sevush] “according to one of it’s better known proponents it’s taken 5 years for X to be suitable for long form work. Well, I guess that is progress.
“This was apparently a new problem. Previous versions have been tested with a timeline up to 588 *days* long, and with up to 1,000 layers:
Although described as a “long timeline” performance problem, this new issue doesn’t really require a long timeline. It can be seen in a 15 min. timeline provided there are many connected clips. It is supposedly fixed in 10.3.2. It was some kind of performance regression inadvertently introduced when adding the “Timeline 2” functionality.
-
[Herb Sevush] “So according to one of it’s better known proponents it’s taken 5 years for X to be suitable for long form work. Well, I guess that is progress.”
Took Premiere a lot longer, though.
Scott Witthaus
Senior Editor/Post Production Supervisor
1708 Inc./Editorial
Professor, VCU Brandcenter
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up