Activity › Forums › Apple Final Cut Pro › 10.1 and sparse images
-
10.1 and sparse images
Posted by Craig Alan on December 19, 2013 at 8:28 pmI will be managing a lab for editing with many students sharing the same computer and raid.
I need to mount and unmount sparse images in order for each student to have access to his/her files and only his/her files.Is this still possible with the new media management of 10.1?
Below Tim Jones mentioned that when updating FCP prompts you to mount all sparse images.
Mac Pro, macbook pro, Imacs (i7); Camcorders: Panasonic AG-HPX170/AG-HPX250P, Canon HV30/40, Sony Z7U, VX2000, PD170; FCP 6 certified; write professionally for a variety of media; teach video production in L.A.
Charlie Austin replied 12 years, 8 months ago 6 Members · 16 Replies -
16 Replies
-
James Cude
December 19, 2013 at 8:43 pmWouldn’t giving each student his or her own Library make more sense?
-
Brett Sherman
December 19, 2013 at 8:56 pmIt should work fine with Sparse Bundles. It looks to me like the only limitation is that you can’t use materials on another Sparse Bundle without FCP X copying it into the one where your project resides.
-
Jeff Kirkland
December 19, 2013 at 9:26 pmI would think that using a library per student would be the better option although there’s no reason that the sparse bundles won’t work once they’re updated. You’d just have a library in each sparse bundle.
The only advantage to sparse bundles would be if you had them password protected.
Jeff Kirkland | Video Producer | Southern Creative Media | Melbourne Australia
http://www.southerncreative.com.au | G+: https://gplus.to/jeffkirkland | Twitter: @jeffkirkland -
Bob Zelin
December 19, 2013 at 11:03 pmyou don’t need sparse disk images, and you didn’t need them in the version befor FCP X 10.1. You just enable NFS on your server, and now “Add SAN Location” just works (like it does on XSAN) – no need for sparse disk images.
I have not tried 10.1, so I have no opinions on the new release, or how it works.
Bob Zelin
Bob Zelin
Rescue 1, Inc.
maxavid@cfl.rr.com -
Craig Alan
December 19, 2013 at 11:22 pmI need to have students have no access to other student’s work. This is not an issue of organization.
Mac Pro, macbook pro, Imacs (i7); Camcorders: Panasonic AG-HPX170/AG-HPX250P, Canon HV30/40, Sony Z7U, VX2000, PD170; FCP 6 certified; write professionally for a variety of media; teach video production in L.A.
-
Craig Alan
December 19, 2013 at 11:25 pmI tried password protecting sparse images but it took forever to have the protection apply and file sizes have become too large for that. BUT with a simple finder account students cannot mount an unmounted drive. So as the admin I can control what they have access to. And because of this I only need one other account than mine. A student account with a simple finder.
Mac Pro, macbook pro, Imacs (i7); Camcorders: Panasonic AG-HPX170/AG-HPX250P, Canon HV30/40, Sony Z7U, VX2000, PD170; FCP 6 certified; write professionally for a variety of media; teach video production in L.A.
-
Jeff Kirkland
December 19, 2013 at 11:28 pmIn that case you’re probably better working with libraries inside the sparse bundles as the new libraries will be seen as packages rather than hard drives so your system wouldn’t work.
Jeff Kirkland | Video Producer | Southern Creative Media | Melbourne Australia
http://www.southerncreative.com.au | G+: https://gplus.to/jeffkirkland | Twitter: @jeffkirkland -
Craig Alan
December 19, 2013 at 11:39 pmWe do not have our media on central server. Each computer will be connected to its own raid. Each Imac/raid will have multiple users throughout the week. I need each student to only have access to his/her work and no one else’s. I do not want to mange over 200 passwords and accounts. I want to control what media they have access to in an easy flexible way. I’m not saying a properly networked system wouldn’t work better, but I have no experience setting it up.
I did do experiments with the current plan and with 10.7 and FCP X 10.0x I did not find any problems working with the app or any way for the simple finder account to access the unmounted sparse images. It was also a neat container for each project, easy to clone, easy to move, easy to delete.
Again I’m sure a properly networked system would be better. So I am not arguing my way is better. It is just a way I know how to solve the problem of protecting each student’s work.
Mac Pro, macbook pro, Imacs (i7); Camcorders: Panasonic AG-HPX170/AG-HPX250P, Canon HV30/40, Sony Z7U, VX2000, PD170; FCP 6 certified; write professionally for a variety of media; teach video production in L.A.
-
Craig Alan
December 19, 2013 at 11:46 pmWhat I have now is sets of FCP project and event folders inside each sparse image with all related files for each project. I’m not using the sparse images as just containers for referenced media.
So wouldn’t using the new library system inside images work the same way? Unless FC insists on having access to any image on any connected physical drive.
Mac Pro, macbook pro, Imacs (i7); Camcorders: Panasonic AG-HPX170/AG-HPX250P, Canon HV30/40, Sony Z7U, VX2000, PD170; FCP 6 certified; write professionally for a variety of media; teach video production in L.A.
-
Jeff Kirkland
December 19, 2013 at 11:58 pmWhat you said is pretty much what I was meaning 🙂
The new library structure is pretty much the oppositie of past functionality. The libraries can exist anywhere on the hard drive and only the libraries you open show up. You can also launch FCPX with a particular library open and ready to go by double clicking on the library.
Libraries can also be closed without having to shut down FCPX.
Jeff Kirkland | Video Producer | Southern Creative Media | Melbourne Australia
http://www.southerncreative.com.au | G+: https://gplus.to/jeffkirkland | Twitter: @jeffkirkland
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up