Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

  • Bret Williams

    October 25, 2012 at 5:14 pm

    That and blading through more than on track at once shift+cmd+b! Those two, audio, and piops will save more time than anything.

  • Andy Field

    October 25, 2012 at 5:59 pm

    blading through all layers….

    Does FCP7’s in – out select in to out — shift delete work in FCPX? — that was the quickest way to remove a large chunk of everything and pull it back together.

    Andy Field
    FieldVision Productions
    N. Bethesda, Maryland 20852

  • Bret Williams

    October 25, 2012 at 6:16 pm

    Not as simply as that. But now that you can blade through all layers, just deleting the clip in the primary would probably do the same thing if all the layers above are connected to it. Seems like a good function to bring back.

  • Jeremy Garchow

    October 25, 2012 at 6:25 pm

    [Andy Field] “Does FCP7’s in – out select in to out — shift delete work in FCPX? — that was the quickest way to remove a large chunk of everything and pull it back together.”

    You don’t need all those steps.

    in the primary, define a range, hit delete.

    unless of course you don’t want to do that.

  • Andy Field

    October 25, 2012 at 8:43 pm

    but more steps are more fun!

    Andy Field
    FieldVision Productions
    N. Bethesda, Maryland 20852

  • Jeremy Garchow

    October 25, 2012 at 9:33 pm

    [Andy Field] “but more steps are more fun!”

    Definitely keeps the heart rate up.

  • Andy Field

    October 25, 2012 at 11:36 pm

    Aerobic editing

    Andy Field
    FieldVision Productions
    N. Bethesda, Maryland 20852

  • Misha Aranyshev

    October 26, 2012 at 12:26 am

    You don’t need to select in to out to ripple delete in FCP 7. Just in and out.

  • David Powell

    October 26, 2012 at 1:55 am

    Does this mean the blade tool will work on audio only with an audio clip that has been disconnected from its parent? Currently I’m not able to do this which is a real pita

  • Bret Williams

    October 26, 2012 at 5:05 am

    But it won’t do that. The clips above the range won’t get deleted. They’ll just get mashed together in that awesome non-destructive editing manner apple invented.

    However, I tested the new method and it’s pretty much the same steps. Go to point A and instead of marking an in, do a shift+cmd+b, then go to point b and shift+cmd+b. Now in the primary, highlight the clip between pt a and b and press delete. All the clips above are connected to it because of the blading process, and so they get deleted too since they’re connected. There really is a method to the madness.

    In 10.0.5 wihtout the blading, you could delete the clip between a and b, but the clips above would just slideabove and under clips that come after pt b in no apparent logical order. And you’d have to manually trim every clip back, or slide and delete each clip, then delete.

    Blading through everything is such a huge improvement in my multi layered bullet pts workflow!

Page 1 of 3

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy