Activity › Forums › Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy › edit alexa prores4444 in fcp without destroying bit depth and color?
-
edit alexa prores4444 in fcp without destroying bit depth and color?
Posted by Adam Berk on April 16, 2011 at 4:24 pmWe are just getting starting on a multi facility vfx project and our first task to be completed is a vfx edit of the approved selects from the raw original camera footage. Files are prores4444 Log-C from Alexa. What I’d like to know is this; would it be possible to cut the selects in an FCP sequence and export to a flame readable uncompressed format without destroying the bit depth and color space of the Alexa files? To the best of my knowledge, FCP only supports 8-bit material when working with RGB and will often produce gamma shifts in this situation as well (thus destroying the Log-C curve). Will this hold true in my situation?
Thanks for any input.
Roberto Delgado replied 15 years ago 8 Members · 30 Replies -
30 Replies
-
Shane Ross
April 16, 2011 at 4:47 pmFCP can edit ProRes 4444 natively just fine. Sequence settings for it and everything. How to get it to a Flame? No idea. But FCP edits PR4444 as 10 bit. Apple invented the codec, and the NLE supports it. It’d be silly if it didn’t.
Shane
GETTING ORGANIZED WITH FINAL CUT PRO DVD…don’t miss it.
Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def -
Adam Berk
April 16, 2011 at 4:55 pmIt certainly would be silly. So even though we’re talking 10bit RGB here, you’re saying that PR4444 is a situation where the 8-bit limitation of FCP’s RGB implementation and gamma shift issues no longer apply?
-
Chris Kenny
April 16, 2011 at 6:01 pm[Adam Berk] “It certainly would be silly. So even though we’re talking 10bit RGB here, you’re saying that PR4444 is a situation where the 8-bit limitation of FCP’s RGB implementation and gamma shift issues no longer apply?”
ProRes 4444 can encode either RGB or YUV data (YUV lets you store subsampled color, it doesn’t require you to). It’s possible ProRes always represents itself to FCP as YUV to take advantage of high bit depth rendering, performing conversions internally. Red’s Redcode codec uses this trick, I think. I’ve never been able to find a definitive answer to this question.
—
Digital Workflow/Colorist, Nice Dissolve.You should follow me on Twitter here. Or read What is FCP X’s relationship to iMovie? on our blog.
-
Paul Provost
April 16, 2011 at 7:33 pmIt’s great flying blind on this stuff isn’t it?
https://www.postandbeam.tv
grade and finish @ post + beam -
Rafael Amador
April 16, 2011 at 7:37 pmHi Adam,
You need third part software to render that in FC without destroying the bit depth.
FC can render just 8bRGB, so with that stuff you can only cut and export with NO RENDERING.
You can also make FC-Color and out keeping your bit depth.[Shane Ross] “FCP can edit ProRes 4444 natively just fine. Sequence settings for it and everything.”
FC can’t render 10b RGB.
When conform a sequence to Prores444, the sequence sets automatically to “Render in High Precision YUV”.
If you render and export that from FC, I don’t know what a heck you are getting?
Prores444 RGB?
Prores444 YUV?[Chris Kenny] “ProRes 4444 can encode either RGB or YUV data (YUV lets you store subsampled color, it doesn’t require you to). It’s possible ProRes always represents itself to FCP as YUV”
Prores444 needs further development yet. The color space (RGB or YUV) must be a choice on export.
Also needs an option for Video-Range/Full-Range, like any pro 10bRGB codec.
Hopefully on FCX.
rafael -
Adam Berk
April 16, 2011 at 8:20 pmHas it been confirmed/tested/proven by anyone that it’s possible to do a cuts only edit of 10bit RGB material and export from FCP without modifying the picture data? Has apple confirmed this in a tech paper somewhere?
If so, does this rule also apply when exporting to a different codec than the source/sequence? In this example, I’d like to cut the PR4444 and export to a discreet readable 10bit RGB format. The prores import features on the discreet systems are highly unreliable and basically don’t work. If they did, we could avoid all of this.
Thanks so much for all the weekend responses.
-
Rafael Amador
April 16, 2011 at 8:56 pm[Adam Berk] “Has it been confirmed/tested/proven by anyone that it’s possible to do a cuts only edit of 10bit RGB material and export from FCP without modifying the picture data? Has apple confirmed this in a tech paper somewhere?”
Hi Adam,
I asked the people of “Sheer” (Bitjazz), to do that test.
They tested with their 10b/444/RGB (no Apple 10bRGB).
They compared the files (before/after FC with NO RECOMPRESSION) and they found that both files were identical pixel by pixel.
If there is not recompression, what you put in the time-line is what you get on export.
FC makes the movie putting together the cuts but keeps all the original setting.[Adam Berk] “If so, does this rule also apply when exporting to a different codec than the source/sequence? In this example, I’d like to cut the PR4444 and export to a discreet readable 10bit RGB format.”
The only problem is that any conversion in FC pass by going to 10bYUV. You would make 10 bRGB > 10bYUV > 10b RGB. FC would manage the color space conversion. If you don’t see any kind of gamma or color shifts, should be OK.
rafael -
Adam Berk
April 16, 2011 at 9:04 pmSorry if I wasn’t clear in my last post. The reason for conversion is that prores files can’t be reliably imported into the autodesk systems. This is a flame job.
-
Adam Berk
April 16, 2011 at 9:09 pmOk. So theoretically, as long as we export using the same settings as what’s in the sequence, we should be fine. We could then theoretically take an EDL from the edited sequence, preconform in resolve with no grading and render out to DPX in source mode to get the individual shots in a format that’s compatible with our pipeline.
This sounds like a plan that may be worth a try.
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up