-
On-location HD monitoring — Cheap
I have to do some location editing, of high-def material, and am trying to decide whether to buy a Matrox MXO,and if so, which one. (The Mini, I’m hoping.) I currently do not have a way to monitor HD out of my MacBook Pro.
The guru here have strongly advised location editors to use a video monitor (?or perhaps a computer screen fed by an MXO2?) to make sure that what they’re seeing on the laptop screen will actually work for broadcast.
I’m wondering what, exactly, I would gain by this. An MXO2 Mini isn’t that expensive, but spending nothing is always better than spending unnecessarily. The MacBook’s screen is of course very sharp and revealing of the video image. I could run a firewire cable from the MacBook to an HDV/DVCAM camera, and output a standard def image via firewire to the LCD screen of that camera. It is a very shrunken image, but I imagine I could detect field problems with it.
Please correct me if I’m wrong: Another reason to buy an MXO2 Mini is to use it back in the studio, to look at my HD edits on a nice big (high-end consumer) HDMI monitor or even a 24″ Dell monitor.
I know this has been discussed ad infinitum, but I’m curious about the “why, exactly” question. btw – the HD monitor I would use is my Marshall 6.5″ field monitor. Would I be better off bringing along a larger computer monitor?
Thanks.
Bob C