Activity › Forums › Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy › Save Time When Exporting H.264 Clips Out of Final Cut Pro
-
Save Time When Exporting H.264 Clips Out of Final Cut Pro
Posted by Mason Pelt on September 13, 2010 at 5:22 pmI know many of the people who populate this forum are producing content for the web and I’f your using final cut pro. that means sitting and waiting for final cut to exporte in H.264. We all know is butt slow about exporting H.264.
This is a tutorial I made that shows how a way to speed up rendering H.264 videos out of final cut pro by using MPEG Streamclip
The reason this message is short, cryptic and misspelled is because I’m dyslectic.
Mason Pelt
https://meancreativity.comJason Brown replied 15 years, 11 months ago 9 Members · 11 Replies -
11 Replies
-
Jason Brown
September 13, 2010 at 6:23 pmWhy wouldn’t you use Send to Compressor…no export time…and it does it in the background with FCP7.
-Jason
-
Mason Pelt
September 13, 2010 at 6:25 pmI’ve done that. I’t dosen’t seem to as fast.
The reason this message is short, cryptic and misspelled is because I’m dyslectic.
Mason Pelt
https://meancreativity.com -
Chris Tompkins
September 13, 2010 at 6:43 pmInvest in good compression software – you’ll never regret it.
Episode.
Chris Tompkins
Video Atlanta -
Mason Pelt
September 13, 2010 at 8:02 pmI said final cut express on the website as an SEO thing. I used final cut pro 7 in the video.
The reason this message is short, cryptic and misspelled is because I’m dyslectic.
Mason Pelt
https://meancreativity.com -
Erik Naso
September 13, 2010 at 8:30 pmBut how does it look? Not sure about the intermediate codec for quality. If you make a reference video and use your cores in compressor I think the end result will be cleaner and still pretty fast.
https://www.mediaartproductions.com
-
Michael Gissing
September 14, 2010 at 12:26 amIf you need speed, then get an H264 accelerator like Elgato or Matrox (which works with Compressor I believe).
-
Zane Barker
September 14, 2010 at 6:39 amCouple of issues I see.
First off in your video you often say rendering when you really mean exporting or compressing they are not the same thing. For example you say render for the web. One does not render for the web you compress for the web.
Second, Just simply export using current time line settings instead of exporting AIC. For you AIC may be the best option because you may be editing in AIC already. If you are not editing AIC exporting as AIC would add an additional level of compression to your final video.
Third, Compressor will be much faster if you set up a virtual cluster, and a virtual cluster would definitely bead the speed of streamclip. Also using a device like the Turbo.264 from Elgato would also be much faster then using streemclip.
**Hindsight is always 1080p**
-
Andy Mees
September 14, 2010 at 7:41 amMatrox Compress HD / MAX chipset … fastest compression, best quality, works with Compressor, Episode and more.
-
Rafael Amador
September 14, 2010 at 10:44 ami agree with no “sending to Compressor”.
A “Multi-pass” for H264 means three passes (3). That means three times rendering the whole sequence (Compressor doesn’t uses the FC renders). However the advantage of “Send to Compressor” is that you send a full Uncompress 444 movie, not a poor AIC.
Normally I use MPGStreamclip although, IMHO the best compressor is HandBrake. The problem is that do not accepts Prores.
rafael
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up