Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy Transcoding first or rendering file on sequence, same quality?

  • Transcoding first or rendering file on sequence, same quality?

    Posted by Dave Gage on August 7, 2010 at 1:19 am

    Please disregard the work flow aspects of this, but…

    Will adding a file type that is not pre-transcoded to ProRes 422 to a ProRes 422 sequence, which of course will need to be rendered to conform, end up being the same quality as if I had transcoded the file previously?

    In some cases, it’s easier for me to drag a bunch of files into the Browser, preview them, add In and Out points to a select few and then render on the timeline. I haven’t noticed any quality issues or problems, I was just wondering if I’m missing something.

    Thanks,
    Dave

    Dave Gage replied 16 years ago 3 Members · 4 Replies
  • 4 Replies
  • Jerry Hofmann

    August 8, 2010 at 1:26 pm

    You’re not missing anything… it’s the same quality either way as far as I know.

    Jerry

    Apple Certified Trainer, Producer, Writer, Director Editor, Gun for Hire and other things. I ski. My Blog: https://blogs.creativecow.net/Jerry-Hofmann

    8-Core 3.0 Intel Mac Pro, Dual 2 gig G5, AJA Kona SD, AJA Kona 2, Huge Systems Array UL3D, AJA Io HD, 17″ MBP, Matrox MXO2 with MAX Cinema Displays

  • Dave Gage

    August 8, 2010 at 5:53 pm

    Jerry,

    I appreciate your reply. This will simplify my workflow quite a bit. If a move an originally non-ProRes clip in the sequence, it does not need to be re-rendered (only the transitions, which is fine).

    If I take the the same clip and copy it over to a new sequence within the same project, I do need to re-render it, but I’m fine with this as I don’t see this coming up much for me (no outside clients, just my work and family projects).

    Thanks again,
    Dave

  • John Fishback

    August 8, 2010 at 8:14 pm

    I think if a clip needs to be retimed and/or rescaled, you’ll have better results using Compressor which does a much better job at those tasks than FCP. Turning on Frame Controls and upping the quality settings to best produces very good results, although, it can take a while. You can test this easily by dropping a short non-ProRes clip into a ProRes sequence and rendering it. Then, convert the same file in Compressor to ProRes. Bring that file into the same sequence and play to compare. Be sure to use a broadcast monitor.

    John

    MacPro 8-core 2.8GHz 8 GB RAM OS 10.5.8 QT7.6.4 Kona 3 Dual Cinema 23 ATI Radeon HD 3870, 24″ TV-Logic Monitor, ATTO ExpressSAS R380 RAID Adapter, PDE enclosure with 8-drive 6TB RAID 5
    FCS 3 (FCP 7.0.2, Motion 4.0.2, Comp 3.5.2, DVDSP 4.2.2, Color 1.5.2)

    Pro Tools HD w SYNC IO & 192 Digital I/O, Yamaha DM1000, Millennia Media HV-3C, Neumann U87, Schoeps Mk41 mics, Genelec Monitors, PrimaLT ISDN

  • Dave Gage

    August 9, 2010 at 3:42 am

    John,

    Thank you for your thoughts. I’m a big fan of the Frame Controls in Compressor and have had excellent results with them on Best and even Better settings.

    I like your thought on the quick comparison, I will give that a try.

    Thanks,
    Dave

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy