Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy Found a good reason to choose Kona over Matrox (hope you are listening matrox!)

  • Found a good reason to choose Kona over Matrox (hope you are listening matrox!)

    Posted by Jason Brown on October 21, 2009 at 5:12 pm

    As I was posting in another topic…I picked Matrox over Kona because of the Max technology…I’ve been VERY pleased with Matrox, encoding is amazingly fast…tech support has been helpful…BUT

    My reason to choose Kona over Matrox (this is in a pro setup) – With Matrox, to monitor audio from your MacPro tower…you have to take the mini stereo plug, convert to unbalanced 1/4″. In my setup with a ton of wiring…trying to isolate the cable as much as possible…I have buzz in my unbalanced audio.

    The KONA allows you to choose that hardware from your system preferences and output your computer’s audio through the balanced outputs of the KONA, removing any hum or buzzing.

    This is what I’ve found. Comments? Thoughts?

    I’ve looked into a D/A converter…but they are very costly when you can get the functionality from a I/O card.

    -Jason

    Jason Brown replied 16 years, 9 months ago 9 Members · 21 Replies
  • 21 Replies
  • Shane Ross

    October 21, 2009 at 5:28 pm

    You are taking the audio out from the MacPro and going IN to the Matrox? Or am I reading this wrong?

    I take the Mac output and route that to my mixer…that is my MAC output. Then I take the MXO2 audio and ALSO route that to my mixer, that is my FCP audio output. Balanced audio from the MXO2.

    Or am I missing something?

    Shane

    GETTING ORGANIZED WITH FINAL CUT PRO DVD…don’t miss it.
    Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def

  • Jason Brown

    October 21, 2009 at 5:40 pm

    No…

    Balanced audio from the MacPro. Internet, music, desktop audio.

    I’m taking that to a mixer as well…but it’s not balanced and there is a buzz in my audio (it’s minor, but there)

    This post is not referring to Final Cut at all…just put it in here because I did a lot of research on whether to get Matrox or Kona…and I found a good reason to choose Kona over Matrox. – Balanced audio from MacPro.

    Make sense?

  • Shane Ross

    October 21, 2009 at 5:47 pm

    [Jason Brown] “This post is not referring to Final Cut at all…just put it in here because I did a lot of research on whether to get Matrox or Kona…and I found a good reason to choose Kona over Matrox. – Balanced audio from MacPro.

    Make sense?”

    No…not at all. If this doesn’t deal with Final Cut AT ALL, then how on EARTH does the MXO or Kona come in to play? They don’t affect the mini port coming out of the Mac at all. Whether or not the MAC PRO delivers balanced audio…how does the CAPTURE CARD affect that?

    Shane

    GETTING ORGANIZED WITH FINAL CUT PRO DVD…don’t miss it.
    Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def

  • Jason Brown

    October 21, 2009 at 5:53 pm

    [Shane Ross] “Whether or not the MAC PRO delivers balanced audio…how does the CAPTURE CARD affect that? “

    Kona is an option in your system pref’s from the mac menu as an audio output option – headphones – line out – digital out – Kona is there as well. (from the research I’ve done) Apparently Black Magic supports output of the audio from the MacPro as well.

    Matrox doesn’t.

    Make sense now? 🙂

    -Jason

  • Shane Ross

    October 21, 2009 at 5:57 pm

    Ah…yes.

    But that is HARDLY a reason to choose one over the other…system audio output. That seems like such a minor thing. You’d really spend $1000 more for that option? Or $1400 more for the IO HD if you are on a laptop?

    Shane

    GETTING ORGANIZED WITH FINAL CUT PRO DVD…don’t miss it.
    Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def

  • Margus Voll

    October 21, 2009 at 5:58 pm

    HI.

    I bit off topic here on FCP but take Apogee Duet and you will be fine.
    All balanced all happy.

    Margus

    https://iconstudios.eu

  • Jason Brown

    October 21, 2009 at 6:14 pm

    nice link…thanks. I’ll look into it.

  • Jason Brown

    October 21, 2009 at 6:28 pm

    MXO2 with Max = 1995 (google price search – B&H)

    AJA Kona LHe = 1295 (B&H)

    [Shane Ross] “You’d really spend $1000 more for that option?”

    Looks like about 600 less actually.

    -Jason

  • Walter Biscardi

    October 21, 2009 at 6:48 pm

    The Kona shows up in the preferences because it’s an internal piece of hardware and the drivers then show up in the System Prefs.

    We run all AJA Kona products here in our shop too, but audio monitoring and the ability to switch in the System Prefs is hardly a make or break reason to choose one product over the other.

    Walter Biscardi, Jr.
    Editor, Colorist, Director, Writer, Consultant, Author.
    HD Post and Production
    Biscardi Creative Media

    “Foul Water, Fiery Serpent” now in Post.

    Creative Cow Forum Host:
    Apple Final Cut Pro, Apple Motion, Apple Color, AJA Kona, Business & Marketing, Maxx Digital.

    Blog!

    Twitter!

  • Margus Voll

    October 21, 2009 at 6:52 pm

    If i’m correct matrox states that unbalanced is for monitoring and you know what you get.

    I agree with Walter. If you get pro gear you mean business and get gear for your work.

    Margus

    https://iconstudios.eu

Page 1 of 3

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy