• Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy

  Xsan Tuner vs FCP 6.0.5 real performance

  Posted by James Jr tan on January 19, 2009 at 2:03 am

  we had an XSAN 2.1 over an FCP 6.0.5, we simulate our raid storage performance
  using XSAN TUNER 1.0 and we are very happy with the results of the task FINAL CUT READ, with 3 streams counts we had surpass the target performance 503MBS without dropping a frames, now if on real FINAL CUT PRO 6.0.5 application,we had a sequence with 3 video clip and when we play this sequence(which is READ),it only gives us around 2MBS.

  My question is,why FCP gives this us this number tho XSAN TUNER gives a very good performance?

  i really appreciate if someone give me explanation.

  Thanks for your help in advance!!!!!!

  James Jr tan replied 17 years, 7 months ago 1 Member · 0 Replies
• 0 Replies

Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up