-
Sharknado 2 edited on…..(drumroll) Premiere Pro CC
-
29 Replies
-
That’s a “Cold Mountain” moment for Adobe then
Steve Connor
Hoping to become a pedant
-
…and FCP 7. Go team! lol
————————————————————-
~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~ -
[Steve Connor] “That’s a “Cold Mountain” moment for Adobe then”
More like a “Rules of Attraction” moment. “Gone Girl” could be Adobe’s “Cold Mountain”.
-
Just a few thoughts.
Technology has drastically changed since Cold Mountain. What was quite an achievement in those days, any decent editor with any decent hard- and software can do in his bedroom now. Feature films are no standard for editing anymore, they only represent an insignificant share of the total editing market. So to the majority of people this will not mean very much, simply because they don’t work in that segment. Just like it won’t matter if the next WB blockbuster will be cut on FCP X, or not. How many feature films have been cut on Lightworks, and where is that NLE today?
– Ronny
-
[Ronny Courtens] “How many feature films have been cut on Lightworks, and where is that NLE today?”
Quite a few and expanding onto a new platform? 🙂
Shawn
-
And this is something to be proud of?
-
sure why not just say that Jan Kovacs is cutting Will Smith’s hundred million feature for Warner Bros on X?
because he is cutting it, and it’s beyond obvious he’s cutting it on X?
https://twitter.com/S0nofaB1tch
It should beat the arriving PPro Fincher/Coen Brothers to the punch – why not trumpet it in the meantime?
https://vimeo.com/user1590967/videos http://www.ogallchoir.net promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics
-
[Aindreas Gallagher] ” why not trumpet it in the meantime?”
Because stuff like this is way more impressive?
64 layers project…
————————————————————-
~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~Some contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Vimeo framework” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.
-
jesus never show that again. that’s a michael bayhem transformers extinction level pointless power show of editing.
“the only reason we went with FCPX was that it could handle 64 layers of video with ease”
barf. Charlie: Barf.
https://vimeo.com/user1590967/videos http://www.ogallchoir.net promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics
-
[Aindreas Gallagher] “jesus never show that again. that’s a michael bayhem transformers extinction level pointless power show of editing.
“the only reason we went with FCPX was that it could handle 64 layers of video with ease”
barf. Charlie: Barf.”
lol… hey I’m not backing up any claims, i just thought it was interesting. 🙂 I’ve built crazy grids like that in X, it’s fun. I’ve also had to rebuild the same grids in 7 and Pr. (don’t ask) Not as much fun…
————————————————————-
~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up