Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Creative Community Conversations And sometimes NO editing is necessary.

  • And sometimes NO editing is necessary.

    Posted by Bill Davis on March 4, 2014 at 7:52 pm

    I keep saying that the universe of video isn’t what it used to be – and that if any of us succumb to the temptation of thinking of “video” exclusively in terms of Network TV or Hollywood Movies, or whatever the type of work WE do as individuals – we risk not noticing how others who aren’t stuck in those particular forms are finding ways to extend what video actually can be.

    A case in point from a link I got from my niece in San Francisco.

    Mesmerizing.

    https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=740746119303080

    Enjoy.

    Know someone who teaches video editing in elementary school, high school or college? Tell them to check out http://www.StartEditingNow.com – video editing curriculum complete with licensed practice content.

    Aindreas Gallagher replied 12 years, 2 months ago 13 Members · 31 Replies
  • 31 Replies
  • Paul Dickin

    March 4, 2014 at 9:42 pm

    [Bill Davis] “…sometimes NO editing is necessary.”
    Hmmm. Nice, but no cigar 😉
    Quote end credit: “Animator : Seiya Ishii , Nobuyuki Hanabusa”
    So a TON of particle generation and motion tracking…

    But, as you say, a great dance production 🙂

    Edit:
    Quote:
    “Apparently according to Hanabusa, he does it by projection onto a screen, perfecting alignment with the dancers through repeated practice.”
    So the compositing is done before the dancing – 2 pass ‘editing/no editing’ 😉

    Lots of other stuff on his YT channel:
    https://www.youtube.com/user/papanda87

  • Bill Davis

    March 4, 2014 at 10:48 pm

    I didn’t mean that nothing – music, projection, concept were created without editing, but rather that the performance was presented as a cohesive unit rather than an assembly of elements. The sublime tradition of the stage competing and merging with the traditions of broadcast.

    Know someone who teaches video editing in elementary school, high school or college? Tell them to check out http://www.StartEditingNow.com – video editing curriculum complete with licensed practice content.

  • Shawn Miller

    March 4, 2014 at 11:19 pm

    [Bill Davis] “I didn’t mean that nothing – music, projection, concept were created without editing, but rather that the performance was presented as a cohesive unit rather than an assembly of elements. The sublime tradition of the stage competing and merging with the traditions of broadcast.”

    Well, being a fan of dance, live performance and animation, I thought it was very cool. 🙂

    Shawn

  • Andrew Kimery

    March 5, 2014 at 12:32 am

    I’m not seeing anything mind blowing about a single, uncut angle of a dance piece but maybe my head’s just not in the appropriate place right now.

    But I still feel like contributing so, as anyone seen the movie Timecode? Feature film shot in one take on four HD cameras (each on a different character/story branch) presented in a quad split and they use the audio mix to guide the audience between the frames. Movie itself isn’t very good but the concept is interesting.

    https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0220100/?ref_=nm_knf_i3

  • Herb Sevush

    March 5, 2014 at 4:33 am

    [Bill Davis] “I keep saying that the universe of video isn’t what it used to be “

    Lovely piece, Bill. Thanks for posting.

    Herb Sevush
    Zebra Productions
    —————————
    nothin’ attached to nothin’
    “Deciding the spine is the process of editing” F. Bieberkopf

  • Phil Hoppes

    March 5, 2014 at 1:27 pm

    I don’t believe there is any motion tracking at all. This is a live performance not a slick editing composition. Watch it again. There are a few slight but noticeable miss-tracks between the dancers and light. Clearly, the animation was done before, I’m guessing in concert with a choreographer. The light animation is complete and the dancers must learn their moves to go in sync with the animation.

    IMHO it is quite a stunning work of art. It never ceases to amaze me the imagination of what people can come up with. Truly novel.

    Thanks for posting Bill.

  • Walter Soyka

    March 5, 2014 at 1:48 pm

    [Phil Hoppes] “I don’t believe there is any motion tracking at all. This is a live performance not a slick editing composition. Watch it again. There are a few slight but noticeable miss-tracks between the dancers and light. Clearly, the animation was done before, I’m guessing in concert with a choreographer. The light animation is complete and the dancers must learn their moves to go in sync with the animation.”

    I suspect the reverse is true. I’d suppose that the choreographer had a vision for the dance and the animation — specific requests as to what the visuals for each movement should be.

    If I animated this project, I would have wanted motion capture, or at least reference video of the dance to animate over (and I would have used tracking extensively here). To do this from scratch, animation first, you’d have to rig a human body and basically perform all the choreography in animation — no easy task.

    As you say, it would be necessary for the dancers to be precise as they repeated the performance, but that is what good dancers do.

    Walter Soyka
    Principal & Designer at Keen Live
    Motion Graphics, Widescreen Events, Presentation Design, and Consulting
    RenderBreak Blog – What I’m thinking when my workstation’s thinking
    Creative Cow Forum Host: Live & Stage Events

  • Phil Hoppes

    March 5, 2014 at 3:03 pm

    No it is a live performance. There is a link just a few lines below where someone has a link to a similar performance that was done at the TED conference.

    https://tinyurl.com/k3azadz

    There is even a name for it. It is called Quixotic Fusion.

  • Walter Soyka

    March 5, 2014 at 3:41 pm

    [Phil Hoppes] “No it is a live performance. “

    I understand that it’s live performance. It’s live dance with projected visuals, not recorded dance with compositing visuals.

    I’ve worked on few of these integrated dance/visual pieces myself, and we always pre-produced the animations.

    Fr one of the complexity shown here, where points and shapes track the dancers’ movements throughout (much harder than just creating elements that the dancers occasionally interact with), I think the animation follows the dance, not the other way around. For production, I’d want mocap or at least reference video to work from. The slick composition happens up front, then you take away the reference and the projection and scrim handles the “compositing” in real time.

    Walter Soyka
    Principal & Designer at Keen Live
    Motion Graphics, Widescreen Events, Presentation Design, and Consulting
    RenderBreak Blog – What I’m thinking when my workstation’s thinking
    Creative Cow Forum Host: Live & Stage Events

  • Phil Hoppes

    March 5, 2014 at 3:48 pm

    I never said that the animation is live. I do animation for a living. Seeing what is there I believe it has to have been pre-produced but the dancers are doing a live production with the animation projected over. They have obviously worked very hard to learn their moves so to be in sync with the animated overlay. As I said previously, it would not surprise me too that the animation was designed in conjunction with a choreographer.

    All that being said we are diverging hugely from the intent of the original post. It is a very beautiful production. Quite artistic and a very nice blend of old school (dance) with new school (light show). For me it has a very nice esthetic quality and is quite engaging.

Page 1 of 4

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy