-
Adam Lisagor on the lack of FCPX evangilists
on the talk show – great show, they’re up to timothy dalton – Adam Lisagor makes the point that apple had no evangelists this time round, and that that was a surprising omission on their part. OK so they weren’t going to get a walter murch, and as someone pointed out – maybe apple never really wanted to be *quite* that high end in the first place.. but say just someone we all know and trust, a Vincent Laforet of digital video media if you will, maybe Stu Maschwitz cutting a crazy gonzo piece on DSLRs and cutting it in FCPX, I know there’s ripple training up there, but thats different, if we had been able to see a rock solid pro, presumably 33 with stubble but whatever (no reference to Stu), telling us in terms we all would nod to why he started to really get something out of this software.. apple kind of used to do stuff like that a lot – remember when there was like an artists and designers bit to the site, where there were interviews and work throughs?
The fact that they didn’t do any of that this time, when it was such an easy gimmee is a suprisingly basic communications ball drop. From Apple. Communications ball drop. Does not compute. I think it would have made quite a psychological difference in how we perceived the application. I would have been like, well 5tu thinks its ok.. Instead I’m reading his tweets about – lets all have a drink and hope our plug ins code will still work.
I know I’m raking over the dying coals but I thought that was an interesting point made – this launch lacks any of apple’s customary finesse. Are they a bit all over the place, or are they just a bit ‘meh, whatever FCP’ I mean do they still love me? why won’t they look at me? Do they think I look nice in this shirt?.. Love me Apple LOVVVEE MEEEE…
well so anyway.
http://www.ogallchoir.net
promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics