-
cache on external vs internal ssd?
I’m running a 2.8GHZ i7 macbook pro with 16GB ram and SSD drive. is it better to run your cache files on a external thunderbolt with ssd or is the internal fast enough to not make a noticeable difference?
thanks
ben -
3 Replies
-
Thunderbolt is fast enough for the SSD drive. I would suggest getting a big enough SSD to handle the cache and media files if you do that though.
Eric-ADK
Tech Manager
support@adkvideoediting.com -
[ben wolfinsohn] “I’m running a 2.8GHZ i7 macbook pro with 16GB ram and SSD drive. is it better to run your cache files on a external thunderbolt with ssd or is the internal fast enough to not make a noticeable difference?”
The internal SATA bus will be faster than a Thunderbolt-to-SATA adapter, by probably 10-20% in the real world.
You may choose an external drive anyway for more capacity.
Walter Soyka
Designer & Mad Scientist at Keen Live [link]
Motion Graphics, Widescreen Events, Presentation Design, and Consulting
@keenlive | RenderBreak [blog] | Profile [LinkedIn] -
My imac has a 256gb internal ssd drive and a 2tb 7200 rpm drive, I keep the software and cache on the ssd but lately I’m running out of space and I’m always getting a warning about my cache folder not having the specified amount which is around 60gb, should I buy an external thunderbolt ssd drive and levea it exclusively for cache?
I was looking at an Elgato ssd thunderbolt 240 gb but there’s a few complaints about the drive dying after a while.
Can anyone vouch for this drive or recommend a good, reliable and fast drive for cache files?
Thanks.
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up