-
I want to use Motion but…
The idea of Motion has appealed to me since I saw the pre-release demo at NAB years back. Unfortunately, every time I’ve tried to use it I’ve been frustrated. I know it has its champions, so I’d like to ask here for some reassurance that re-delving into Motion in hopes of making it a useful tool for me won’t be time wasted.
Here are my needs and concerns:
I probably won’t ever abandon AE – call me crazy but I like keyframes. What I want from Motion is the integration it offers for titles, and hopefully for building elaborate transitions.
For titles, I’ve found that even if I create any background elements behind the text and pre-render them as a QT with alpha, they take much longer to render than AE – like 8x to 10x as long as AE does even when building the backgrounds on the fly. Are slow render times something that must be expected or am I doing something wrong? Timelines with Motion elements also seem to hang on opening while FCP loads master templates.
For transitions, what I’d love to do is something I used to do 10 years ago with Boris FX and Discrete Edit* – overlap clips on v1 and v2 by x number of frames, and drop an effect on top which would grab v1, apply various filters, resize, etc. and do various other things to v2. In effect, for example, creating a transition where one track zooms, blooms, and fades out, while the other fades in. I haven’t been able to get templates to work for this. Can drop zones automatically grab predetermined video tracks? Is there a different approach that would achieve the same end?
Thanks in advance.
FCS2 CS4
MacPro 8x
5drive eSATA stripe