As Mark said, two ways of doing it… rotate the bike, or dolly the camera around it.
But which way was this done? Hmmmmm…. we’ll never know. Nah, actually we do know… in this case the bike rotated. How do we know that? Well Mark said “The look winds up the same”… which is the one tiny issue that I’ll differ with Mark on. The look is not exactly the same, and it’s that difference that lets us know the bike was rotating.
How can you tell? If the bike rotates, the lighting stays fixed in relative position to the camera. If the camera dollys around, the lighting stays fixed in relative position to the bike. In this case, the lighting was fixed to the camera position, ergo we can assume that the bike rotated. Yes, the camera could have been rotating around the bike, but, but that would mean the lighting would have been rigged to rotate around the bike as well, and it would be fairly inconceivable that someone would go to the trouble for such a cumbersome arrangement.
This could have been either motion footage, or a series of stills. I don’t know this for a fact, but I strongly suspect this was shot as individual still frames with a DSLR. It just has that look to me. If that was the case a shot was taken, the bike was rotated a small measured amount, and another was taken, and so on….
T2
__________________________________
Todd Terry
Creative Director
Fantastic Plastic Entertainment, Inc.
fantasticplastic.com
