-
Favourite codecs
When I am preparing a file for client review, something that I will put online, I tend to automatically reach for the same codec (Photo JPEG) and pull the slider to somewhere between 60 and 90 (mostly depending on how I’m feeling that particular day), have a couple of mouthfuls of coffee, upload the file for review and then wait for the phone call that will tell me they have changed their minds about everything.
However, I would be interested to know what other people do in their workflows. Is it worth changing codecs depending on the job? Should I be doing some kind of research about which are the best? The list is huge, so I am assuming there are some relics in there. I don’t even know if the ones I use are antiques… Should I be using Adobe’s media encoder, rather than After Effects? But who needs the extra hassle when it’s a simple review? I know there is a balance to be had between picture quality and file size, but in my experience clients have been happy viewing files anywhere between 40 MB and 60 MB from the web.
Obviously I’m only talking about intermediate, client review files. Not the files for broadcast.
A
Vertigo Productions
https://www.vertigo.co.uk