• VEGAS Pro

  Amd 8350

  Posted by Thayalan Paramasawam on January 10, 2014 at 1:04 am

  Hi morning,

  I am using AMD processor 8350,16gb ram,graphic card asus gtx 650 and operating system win 7 pro 64 bit.For render Avchd (mts file) its take 2 hours to render 1 hour 20 minute project.
  Pls give me some suggestion to make more faster the rendering time.

  Thank you
  Thayalan Paramasawam

  Stephen Crye replied 12 years, 6 months ago 3 Members · 8 Replies
• 8 Replies

• 

  Norman Black

  January 10, 2014 at 3:51 am

  That render time is about right from my limited experience with Vegas encoders.

  You can try Mainconcept AVC CUDA. That will not be an AVCHD file. It will be MP4 with AVC video and AAC audio.
• 

  Thayalan Paramasawam

  January 10, 2014 at 4:22 am

  Thank you sir for reply,how about intel?
• 

  Norman Black

  January 10, 2014 at 5:47 am

  I did not mention Intel Quicksync since you have an AMD CPU.

  Intel Quicksync will be faster than any of the other encoder options in Vegas. To use Quicksync in Vegas you must use the Sony AVC encoder.

  Another thing. Sony AVC is much faster than the Mainconcept AVC.
• 

  Thayalan Paramasawam

  January 10, 2014 at 6:47 am

  Thank you sir for reply…….actually i am using amd for video editing (3 working station)….but after i saw some forums regarding w.station,i think my amd having some probleums.so i post this question to solve my probleum…speed up my amd but after your adivice i need to change to intel to save my time.
  Because i have to render many projects (1 hour 20 minutes) everyday.

  Thank you
  Thayalan Paramasawam
• 

  Norman Black

  January 10, 2014 at 5:18 pm

  Using Quicksync can be a little quirky when you also have an AMD/Nvidia video card installed in the same machine.

  In such a situation you must have the video drivers installed for both Intel and the other AMD/Nvidia card. If you have only one monitor and that is hooked up to the AMD/Nvidia card you will have to take measures to get the Intel functioning.

  Here is a link with some info
  https://mirillis.com/en/products/tutorials/action-tutorial-intel-quick-sync-setup_for_desktops.html

  Another option is if your monitor has multiple inputs. You can connect the video card and Intel to the same monitor and just not use the Intel input.

  It is a pain if you have an AMD/Nvidia card and want the Intel graphics only for Quicksync, but it can be done.
• 

  Thayalan Paramasawam

  January 11, 2014 at 12:47 am

  Thank very much sir for adivice me…….i will feed back to you after use the steos you given…..
• 

  Thayalan Paramasawam

  January 13, 2014 at 1:38 am

  Hi morning sir,

  Thank you sir…..after i do sync……i improve my rendering speed.
  Thank you
• 

  Stephen Crye

  January 23, 2014 at 3:33 am

  [Norman Black] “Another thing. Sony AVC is much faster than the Mainconcept AVC.”

  I’ve been doing benchmarks like crazy the last week, using the “red car” project. My times are consistently shorter with MainConcept AVC than Sony AVC.

  For example, tonight, after trying something strange (I left the window open to chill down my computer room to start with a cold GPU, yes, I am odd), I was able to get the render down to 3:08 with MainConcept CUDA, but Sony with “GPU if available” or “Automatic” was 3:28.

  Steve

  Win7 Pro X64 on Dell T7500, MultiTB SATA, 8GB RAM, nVidia Quadro 2000, Vegas 12, 11, 10, 9 DVDA 6.0 & 5.2(build 135) Sony HDR-CX550V, Panasonic GH3 with LUMIX G X VARIO 12-35mm / F2.8 ASPH, LUMIX G X VARIO 35-100mm / F2.8

Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up