Steve Strickler
Forum Replies Created
-
Dave,
Thanks for the laugh…no it’s just for DVD. I am not sure why it has fields at all since it was all shot progressive. Apparently the job was mastered to tape, then pulled back in to generate files for me. Who knows WHAT happened during all of that mess. There was some 23.98 that was brought back as 59.97.
Getting dizzy over here! 😉 -
How ’bout a pull-down issue on export? I think there was some confusion and some was shot 24 and some was shot 29.97?
-
Once converted/resized the D1 footage and re-rendered out of AE, it now plays ok, but I can see fields in the playback. I am viewing on a set top player on an LCD. I don’t recall having seen this before when running SD stuff.
-
Yes, it’s about killing me here. No matter what I do it looks bad.
I guess I need to go back and yell at the provider. How could I tell if the fields are wrong? -
Thanks for the speedy reply. I did precisely that… interpreted lower, placed in DV comp, field-rendered as ProRes422, the ran though Adobe Media Encoder CS5.
Whenever I bring it into Encore (or DVD Studio) the fields still look crappy. I tried to burn and display on a set top and it still looks bad.
I wonder if something is screwy with the file output I got!? Ideas?
Thanks.