Forum Replies Created

Page 3 of 4
  • Steve Adams

    February 17, 2017 at 4:03 pm in reply to: Why does render take so much longer than encode?

    One more data point. I believe the reason the render I did by hitting Return took so much longer than the render that occurred during export is that the source is 1920×1080 while I was exporting to 1280×720. So the first render had to manage 2 million pixel frames while the export render worked with 1 million pixel frames. And I have a feeling that render time may be an exponential function of frame size, so doubling the frame size might quadruple the render time.

    Anyway, thanks to everyone for their input.

    Steve

  • Steve Adams

    February 16, 2017 at 4:02 pm in reply to: Why does render take so much longer than encode?

    Thank you!

  • Steve Adams

    February 14, 2017 at 4:44 pm in reply to: Why does render take so much longer than encode?

    I see all kinds of export settings in the Export Media screen but I don’t see much about render settings, other than optimize for performance or memory, so I don’t know how to compare the two settings.

    Also, I’m not using AME.

    Thanks

  • Steve Adams

    February 13, 2017 at 12:36 am in reply to: Why does render take so much longer than encode?

    Thanks. But regardless of the render settings, doesn’t encoding to an output file do the exact same render?

  • Steve Adams

    February 10, 2017 at 8:08 pm in reply to: Check size of render files

    I just checked and the Preview File Format is I-Frame Only MPEG. I knew it would be big because I was taking a 30 minute 1924×1080 video down to 33% speed with Optical Flow inserting new frames. But 320GB?!

  • Steve Adams

    February 10, 2017 at 6:49 pm in reply to: Setting numbered markers

    Excellent! The markers panel does it all! Plus you can double-click a marker and add any label you want.

    Thanks!

  • Steve Adams

    February 10, 2017 at 4:10 pm in reply to: Finding where an encoded file was actually written to

    Thanks. That worked!

  • Thanks. I don’t want to maintain the pitch, though. I want it to speed it up, with the video, when I speed up the video. I realize now, from your answer, that the problem is that Preferences has “Maintain Audio Pitch” checked and that’s what’s keeping the sound at the 33% pitch when I speed up the video. When I uncheck that the sound pitch comes up with the video speed, as I want.

    Thanks for making me aware there was a Maintain Audio Pitch check box.

  • Steve Adams

    February 4, 2017 at 1:06 am in reply to: Is there a way to limit processor use during rendering?

    I’ve discovered another data point on this issue. If I just hit Return after a bunch of edits and let PP render the timeline, the load on my system isn’t bad. Task Manager still says all 4 CPUs are running are 100% but I’m able to do other work and barely notice that there’s a heavy task also running on the machine. When the load is intrusive is when I ask PP to build and export an mp4 from the timeline.

    I’m guessing that the build/export entails a lot of disk activity and that’s the hold up, while the render just spins around inside of memory.

    Steve

  • Steve Adams

    February 3, 2017 at 2:58 pm in reply to: Is there a way to limit processor use during rendering?

    Ok, thanks. I thought a “PAUSE” might at least be available. I knows Windows has ways to suspend threads, and it doesn’t seem that hard for Adobe to connect a PAUSE button to one of them. But I guess not.
    Thanks.

Page 3 of 4

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy