Patrick Collins
Forum Replies Created
-
Thank you for the reply. Let me ask you this: If I am simply starting zoomed in at the top left corner of the background, and then zooming outward where the background is at 100%… Is there any beneit using a a camera angle for this, compared to just using scale & position?
-p
-
Yeah, I just confirmed this by hooking my dvd player up to my pro monitor… It’s definitely a result of the mpeg2 compression………. Which makes me think that nothing can be done..
-p
-
Hi There… Yes I am aware of the text– I have since repositioned it.
Well here’s the thing: I do have a preview monitor.. It’s a JVC pro monitor specifically for video work. I have a Firewire to DV converter that outputs to RCA, which I have connected to my monitor via bnc.
When viewing on the monitor, the thin lines look great..
It’s actually after they have been rendered exported to DV NTSC, and encoded on a DVD that they no longer look the way they do…
-patrick
-
Hi.. Thanks for the reply. Well, I tried de-interlacing the graphics in Final cut Pro, but it ended up making it extra flickery… I actually experimented with this by burning a dvd with the graphics repeating, and I applied all of final cut pro’s de-flickering, and de-interlacing options.. One after another.. When I viewed it on my dvd player and TV, I saw the 2px banner look identical (and wrong) in every instance, but the text I have over it actually got horribly flickery on the deinterlaced version.. Everything else looked identical.
So… That didn’t seem to be the problem. You mentioned doubling the frame rate.. How would I go about doing this while super-imposing this graphic over video?
Thank you
-patrick -
Thank you everyone.. All problems are solved.. (And yes, I was talking about composition settings for the pixel aspect ration). The FCP problem was indeed the fact that “anamorphic” wasn’t checked. Thank you again.