Forum Replies Created

Page 21 of 37
  • Olly Lawer

    December 8, 2011 at 3:52 pm in reply to: MacBook Pro vs iMac for FCP?

    Hi,

    I know what I am like – I will want the portability at some point. But thanks for the different insight.

    Interesting what you say about FCP X and Adobe. I think FCP X is a marmite affair – you either love it or hate it…

    Olly Lawer

  • Olly Lawer

    December 8, 2011 at 8:34 am in reply to: MacBook Pro vs iMac for FCP?

    Btw – the Matte screen is the same style as the old MacBooks isn’t it? As in I get no reflection when working outside.

    Are you in the UK or US? Wondering if it’s worth a trip abroad to get one. They are £2,050 here. So about $2,800

    Olly Lawer

  • Olly Lawer

    December 8, 2011 at 8:13 am in reply to: MacBook Pro vs iMac for FCP?

    I’ll go with less cool, but no reflections too I think :).

    Did you buy direct from Apple?

    Olly Lawer

  • Olly Lawer

    December 8, 2011 at 3:28 am in reply to: MacBook Pro vs iMac for FCP?

    Cool. Just out of interest. Did you go with an anti-glare screen?

    Olly Lawer

  • Olly Lawer

    December 8, 2011 at 3:07 am in reply to: MacBook Pro vs iMac for FCP?

    Great. What version? 2.2 GHZ or 2.4 GHZ?

    Olly Lawer

  • Olly Lawer

    December 7, 2011 at 8:39 am in reply to: How do I get this level of quality from YouTube?

    PS – Its goes to show too how much crushing the blacks in the edit has a dramatic effect on the end YouTube compressed result. When the blacks are not crushed youtube shows a horrible pixulated background. Hideous!

    Olly Lawer

  • Olly Lawer

    December 5, 2011 at 4:27 pm in reply to: How do I get this level of quality from YouTube?

    Thanks for your help. Video’s turned out pucker. Not quite as good as the example I gave, but very marginal different. I think you were right Craig. These guys are chucking a lot more uncompressed data at YouTube then I am able to right now. Still, very happy with the results.

    Olly Lawer

  • Olly Lawer

    November 30, 2011 at 5:29 pm in reply to: How do I get this level of quality from YouTube?

    Well at least Blu-Ray has come down in cost considerably. I remember paying the wrong side of £50 for 6 – 25GB disks two years ago. Just picked up 10 – 25GB disks from the same company, TDK, for £16.99.

    However, that deal has disappeared and been replaced by one that is £32.99 for 10. Still less expensive then they were.

    I always back my BPAV and MOVs to different HDs then back up to different BR disks. A little over cautious maybe 🙂

    Olly Lawer

  • Olly Lawer

    November 30, 2011 at 5:19 pm in reply to: How do I get this level of quality from YouTube?

    Cool. Will do.

    Just out of interest and its way off topic, but what to you use to store your footage? Currently I offload everything to Blu-ray disks, but this is not cheap at £4 per 25GB disk.

    Kind regards,

    Olly Lawer

  • Olly Lawer

    November 30, 2011 at 5:07 pm in reply to: How do I get this level of quality from YouTube?

    [Greg Ondera] “That’s interesting about YouTube’s recommendation for 8000 kbps because I think they take that and throw it down to 2002. I get my info for that from Jan Ozer’s new book “Video Compression for Flash, Apple Devices, and HTML5.” When it comes to encoding, I’ve been a longtime fan of his. Check out his blog at https://www.streaminglearningcenter.com/

    Thanks for the link, i’ll check it out. Hmm, I wonder if I could get better results then outputting at 2002 H.264? Worth checking out.

    Olly Lawer

Page 21 of 37

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy