Forum Replies Created

Page 13 of 35
  • Mitchji

    October 24, 2005 at 3:25 am in reply to: Apple HD Displays: 2 x 23

    Hi,

    Check this review of the Dell 24″:
    https://www.barefeats.com/lcd.html

    Click here to get the purchase link and use the coupon code to get a good price:
    https://www.barefeats.com/quick.html
    The 35% off special is back on with the Dell 24″ Wide Aspect LCD Flat Panel Display. Support Bare Feats by clicking OUR DELL LINK then add coupon code 69$8KC79D53S2H after you put it in your shopping cart. Your net cost will about about $779.

    Best Wishes,

    Mitch

  • Mitchji

    October 22, 2005 at 7:31 pm in reply to: dual processor, dual core, quad, blah blah blah

    [MPE] “Taht remain to be seen. “

    Hi,

    I would not be surprised if the benchmarks Apple posted for the quad are biased but unless they are totally and completely bogus it does not remain to be seen.

    Best Wishes,

    Mitch

  • Mitchji

    October 21, 2005 at 11:49 pm in reply to: Dual core, dual processor, blah blah purchase question help

    [gregg brent] “Question: Any opinion as to better to buy tried and tested Dual 2ghz G5 for under 2grand with upgraded Graphics card (ATI or Nvidia…want to play with Motion) OR jump in and buy one of the ‘stepchild’ 2.3 dual core which is untried??”

    Hi,

    The Dual Core 2.3 will perform a little better (maybe 10 or 15 percent) so I think the main factors are price and graphics card (particularly for motion).

    RAM costs a little less for the Dual Core Models.

    Another issue is PCI-E vs PCI-X. If you have existing PCI-X cards you want to use or if you need a card that is not currently available as PCI-E then you need the older model. On the other hand if you are going to be buying cards and can wait a while you would be better off getting a Dual Core model because the cards will be less likely to become obsolete when you upgrade your Powermac.

    Best Wishes,

    Mitch

  • Mitchji

    October 21, 2005 at 11:40 pm in reply to: Dual core, dual processor, blah blah purchase question help

    [Bryan Shelton] “Since none of the Apple apps support multi-threading at this point, dual core vs. single core is a moot point unless you are building a test machine for the future.”

    Hi.

    This is NOT correct. How do you think they take advantage of Dual Processors on the previous Dual Processor models?

    Best Wishes,

    Mitch

  • Mitchji

    October 21, 2005 at 6:20 pm in reply to: dual processor, dual core, quad, blah blah blah

    [mpe] “Also, codes must be written to take advantage of the cores – meaning the application must support more ‘threads.’ If not, the extra horses will remain in the stable.”

    Hi,

    Most of the applications that are important to us (FCP for example) already support multiple processors. Unless the programmers intentionly cripled their code programs that support dual processors will also support 4.

    Best Wishes,

    Mitch

  • Mitchji

    October 21, 2005 at 3:44 pm in reply to: Which dual-core G5 for Uncompressed SD & DVC Pro HD?

    [Walter Biscardi] “Personally, I would look at the current crop of G5’s as they are sure to take a major price drop and you have the most Capture Card options for those machines. “

    Hi,

    On the other hand if you purchase a PCI-X capture card for the older model it is much more likely to become obsolete the next time you upgrade your Mac.

    Best Wishes,

    Mitch

  • Mitchji

    October 21, 2005 at 3:39 pm in reply to: ATI RADEON X800XT thinking of purchase

    Hi,

    https://www.barefeats.com/radx800.html

    “At first glance, it appears the X800 XT Mac Edition should give you equal or better performance than GeForce 6800 Ultra for an aftermarket price equal to the GeForce 6800 GT — plus it only uses one slot. But let’s look at real world performance.”

    https://www.barefeats.com/rad9650.html

    Best Wishes,

    Mitch

  • Mitchji

    October 21, 2005 at 3:35 pm in reply to: dual processor, dual core, quad, blah blah blah

    Hi,

    These benchmarks don’t mean as much as tests using actual applications but they give some idea:
    https://media.99mac.se/g5_dualcore/

    Some excerpts:
    As you can see the 2.3 GHz Dual Core machine is marginally faster than a water-cooled 2.5GHz Dual G5 with a souped-up graphics card. The largest difference is in memory performance, not in the actual processors according to our tests with Xbench. We want to point out that this testing method isn’t completely failsafe but should mostly be seen as a hint of the new machine’s performance.

    Performance-wise, one Dual Core processor doesn’t make for a large difference compared to two old G5 processors. We predict that the new Quad 2.5GHz Powermac will make for a performance increase of 70% or more.

    Best Wishes,

    Mitch

  • Mitchji

    October 21, 2005 at 3:15 pm in reply to: dual processor, dual core, quad, blah blah blah

    Hi,

    One more issue is PCI-express. This is a much better technology than the PCI-X on the older G5’s so in that way for some users it will be a plus. On the other hand if you have some expensive PCI-X cards that won’t work in the new machines or you need a card that currently is only available as a PCI-X card its a problem.

    Best Wishes,

    Mitch

  • Mitchji

    October 20, 2005 at 7:56 pm in reply to: SCSI in PCIe macs

    [Post Office Video] ” I would like to take advantage of the faster rendering and better video card of the quad mac after it ships (and has proven to be reliable) but am not willing to throw away $12,000 of fast and reliable SCSI storage to do so. “

    Hi,

    When they ar shipping and have proven to be reliable there will probably be some supported SCSI cards.

    Best Wishes,

    Mitch

Page 13 of 35

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy