Marcus Moore
Forum Replies Created
-
Huh. I didn’t realize that the one that’s been floating around was truncated to eliminate the Q&A portion.
Here’s the full vid- He says what he has to say about the FCPX update at 54:45.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=tVuf34OiK_U
-
Seeing as Larry is selling training across several NLE platforms now, I don’t think his welfare relies solely on the success of FCPX anymore. A while ago maybe, but he’s diversified in the last year.
What his PERSONAL preference is I have no idea, and I don’t think it’s in his best interest to play favourites either. He’s has just as many Adobe related posts this year as Apple.
-
[Oliver Peters] “There’s essentially nothing mentioned about the next FCP X, version except for two minor comments. So no inside info.”
The only comments he makes I’ve highlighted in my post below
“Larry Jordan dishes some FCPX gossip at IBC”
-
To each their own…
-
Couldn’t someone just post a question about this on Larry’s related blog post?
-
While that’s true- I think as Chris suggests he has a closer relationship to Apple directly, so his sources are likely to be much better placed an his information much more accurate.
The was a fervour between the “sneak peak” in Feb and the NAB 2011 unveiling of FCPX. If Larry is being truthful and hasn’t been engaged in any way by Apple, then perhaps they’re looking to keep things mum enough to under-promise and over-deliver.
Pretty much no one saw LogicX coming- so Apple can still keep secrets when it doesn’t have thousands of foreign workers handling the upcoming product.
-
Yes. I re-watched it too before commenting. It’s a bit foggy.
I’ve inquired elsewhere to see if I can get some further clarification.
-
Aindreas- I’m not sure you know the whole picture.
In the presentation Larry says he spoke with both Sam Mestman AND film’s editor. Two separate people.
Things could have changed or progressed since then, and maybe FCPX’s role in the film has expanded based on the production’s experience so far.
I think that’s just as, if not more likely than him intentionally misrepresenting the situation.
-
It’s obviously unclear from the transcript, but there is a fair amount of sarcasm in that second sentence as delivered by Larry.
-
Very likely.