Lucy Slavinsky
Forum Replies Created
-
Steve,
Thank you very much! Is there any other solution that would allow me to record high quality audio and use the headset or this one would be the best?
Lucy -
Thank you!
Lucy -
Thank you, Bob! Actually almost all of the footage is PAL (I am getting it from Europe). Will it make much difference in the terms of capacity?
Best,
Lucy -
Thank you, Bob. Great tool! The compression codec is ProRes 422 HQ, but it is hard to say how many tapes or video or other media I will have in the end. I would say about 100 hours of footage.
Best,
Lucy -
Thank you very much, Noah!
-
Joe, thank you so much for such comprehensive explanation.
“Another key issue is interlaced material and how you handle that. This is further complicated if the final product is a DVD vs a video file. You will often see material that has “baked in” interlacing artifacts because of improper handling.”
By “final product” do you mean distribution? I am not sure if I understand it fully. The film is intended for broadcast, festivals. Further distribution strategy is probably streaming or downloading. How would you handle the interlacing issue?
Best,
Lucy -
Thank you, Mark! What type of storage do you use for your project?
Best,
Lucy -
Thank you very much!
Lucy -
Hi Joe,
Thank you very much for your response. You are absolutely right – there are all the formats that were available at that time and from all the different sources. You have mentioned EditReady. I have Compressor. Besides the significant diference in the conversion time are there any other advantages for using EditReady? Should I consider Priemier over Final Cut? Am I looking for ProRes 422 as the editing format?
Regards,
Lucy -
Hi Josh,
Thank you very much for your response! The current media is mostly archival footage from 1989 to 2015. There are very few HD clips, the rest will be converted from tape or video. What would be the best time to call?
Best,
Lucy