We got to the bottom of the 720 30P judder with our HPX2000, maybe an obvious solution to some but not to my editor or myself. Yesterday we did a number of 90-degree panning tests (pans with 5-10 second durations) shooting HD & SD, 24P & 30. Regardless of the resolution or panning speeds 30P had virtually no judder compared to the 24P footage.
Jeremy, I tried 60P in the past but felt you lose the progressive scan feel, I always had good results with our SDX900 shooting 30P with very little judder but maintaining the progressive “film” look.
When viewing the test pans, the 30P pans looked great on a 29.97 sequence but if you attempt to place the same clip on a 23.98 sequence and render the 30P clip it plays fine except for pans where there is judder. Our lesson from the P2 tests:
if you shoot a mix of 24P & 30P clips, edit on a 29.97 sequence.
What prompted my post was the judder we experienced in a recent project shooting with the HPX2000 720P. I shot interviews in 24P to give a softer look and our B-roll in 30P to reduce judder in pans.
We first brought our 24P interview footage into a sequence establishing a 23.98 timebase, which looked great. When we eventually brought the 30P B-roll into the sequence, we had to render the clips. After the render the 30P B-roll played OK, (most of the B-roll was not pans so we thought we were OK.) But we did have 2 panning shots that had judder which I thought was due to the camera panning.
But was in fact due to the 23.98 sequence, the same clips played fine without judder
on a 29.97 sequence.
Thanks for your help.
Jeff Cadge