Ian Mapleson
Forum Replies Created
-
Ian Mapleson
January 10, 2015 at 10:34 am in reply to: AE CS6 11.0.1 CUDA BENCHMARK PROJECT – test your graphics cards!I doubt we’ll hear anything until the 980 Ti and Titan II are out. Wouldn’t really
make sense for Adobe to do an update only to have to do another when two more Maxwell
cards come out. Most likely NVIDIA’s waiting until AMD releases its 3K series.Ian.
——–
SGI Guru -
Ian Mapleson
January 2, 2015 at 1:12 pm in reply to: CC 2014 RAM Previews take too long to Start processingMy main thought on this is that, with modern sw techniques now available, it really
ought to be possible to code the app so that it can learn by itself what the optimal
settings are as one’s work progresses, in all sorts of ways.For largely non-technical users (ie. those who cannot be expected to understand how
much RAM a particular scene might require to render), the most appropriate question
is likely to be, what are the generally overall best settings, and what are the
plus/minus consequences of deviating from these?Really though, the app itself ought to be able to learn & adapt; the parameters that
controlled this process could be adjustable, but expecting every user to hard fix
these settings isn’t realistic now, the whole process is too complicated and technical
IMO (eg. re your comment about fragmented memory).Ian.
——–
SGI Guru -
Ian Mapleson
December 31, 2014 at 12:25 pm in reply to: AE CS6 11.0.1 CUDA BENCHMARK PROJECT – test your graphics cards!New 700 cards are easily available from numerous sources in Europe,
that’s not a problem. Price-wise, they’re cheaper than the crazy
pricing of this past summer, but still a bit too costly in most
locations. Used ones don’t yet go for what one might call bargain
prices, ie. not usefully less than new, though I suppose hunting
for a 6GB 780 would be a good win if one can find them. Only the
780 Ti would be quicker than two 580s though.I mentioned the 900s just so the caveat is there, eg. in case the guy
suddenly decides to blow some savings. 😀Ian.
——–
SGI Guru -
Ian Mapleson
December 30, 2014 at 11:41 am in reply to: AE CS6 11.0.1 CUDA BENCHMARK PROJECT – test your graphics cards!If it has to be an all-new card, probably a GTX 770, or if you can find a deal,
a GTX 780. If you can get used cards instead, then look for two used GTX 580 3GB.Don’t buy GTX 970/980 yet as they’re currently not properly supported.
Ian.
——–
SGI Guru -
Ian Mapleson
December 30, 2014 at 11:16 am in reply to: CC 2014 RAM Previews take too long to Start processingLooking at the settings, I have a followup question: I’d read that it’s normally
best to leave at least a couple of cores/threads reserved for other applications,
but Alex has that set to zero. What effect might this have in practice, ie. with
reserved CPUs = 0? Also, I see at the bottom it states the actual no. of CPUs
which will be used is thre – how is this number derived? I’d have thought with an
i7 970 it would still work ok with 4 or even 5 cores, leaving 1 for other tasks.Or are these both akin to the RAM Preview checkbox, ie. the best settings varies
between scenes, etc.?Ian.
——–
SGI Guru -
Ian Mapleson
December 16, 2014 at 8:47 am in reply to: AE CS6 11.0.1 CUDA BENCHMARK PROJECT – test your graphics cards!Using a 780 means just adding some text to the ray trace text file. That’s rather
different to any more involved changes which may or may not allow a card to function
properly for all possible tasks which may try to use it.Btw, there are 6GB 780s, why not use those?
Ian.
——–
SGI Guru -
Ian Mapleson
December 15, 2014 at 9:55 pm in reply to: AE CS6 11.0.1 CUDA BENCHMARK PROJECT – test your graphics cards!yonni,
One cannot judge the CUDA performance of a GPU based on the no. of cores or the
memory bus width. Read my previous posts in this thread discussing the GTX 580;
it has far fewer cores and yet is very strong for CUDA, because the shaders run
at a much higher speed. NVIDIA halved the shader clock after the 500 series (in order
to make power delivery easier to design & control), negating what judgements one might
normally make based on simple things like the no. of cores.This is why the 580 is faster than all the 600 series cards for AE, and it beats the
lesser 700 series cards aswell (only the 780 and 780 Ti are faster), eg. two good 580s
are faster than a Titan Black for AE. See my results here, the Arion page and other test
results such as the Blender Cycles benchmark.Indeed, for some tasks involving CUDA, the 580 beats all the 700 series cards (check the
reviews on tomshardware).Not all tasks use CUDA in the same way though, eg. for AE, a 580 is faster than a 680 by
quite a margin, but for Arion it’s the other way round, especially for multiple GPUs
(Arion scales better).Beware judgments based on simple things like no. of cores, bus width, etc. They can be
very misleading, certainly in this instance.Ian.
——–
SGI Guru -
Ian Mapleson
December 15, 2014 at 3:16 am in reply to: AE CS6 11.0.1 CUDA BENCHMARK PROJECT – test your graphics cards!Except I think most people would prefer proper support rather than an ‘iffy hack’,
so until then, if someone asks, I’ll still answer in the negative.Ian.
——–
SGI Guru -
Ian Mapleson
December 11, 2014 at 8:18 pm in reply to: AE CS6 11.0.1 CUDA BENCHMARK PROJECT – test your graphics cards!yonni writes:
> Not really an option. this is for a home rig and I want the card to be suitable for
> games. also I live in Israel and used K6000\K5000 even if used will be tto expensive.In that case go for a 780, 780 Ti, or multiple 580s. Or of course multiple 780/Ti cards
if the budget permits.> Could you suggest a good format for test purpose?
To be honest I can’t comment on which would be the best, but usually I thought video was
either uncompressed or something like JPEG, but the best thing to do is simply experiment
with the various available formats, see how it affects performance.> I have an ssd for the OS and a standard 7200RPM HD for storage. the footage is on that
> disk. do you think it’s not fast enough for 1080p real time Playback?Certainly not if it’s uncompressed data, and I’ve a feeling png isn’t a compressed format.
I would never use a single drive for any kind of HD stream. For mechanical drives, 2 or 4
disks in RAID0 or RAID10 is best, though a single SSD is definitely fast enough. More
costly of course, but the performance is leaps & bounds beyond a rust spinner. Mind you,
512GB capacity SSDs are lot more affordable now, eg. the MX100.Also, for working with AE, you should absolutely have a separate SSD acting as a cache
drive for AE.> sorry for being noob but exactly you mean by i\o setup?
I mean the storage system.
Ian.
——–
SGI Guru -
Ian Mapleson
December 11, 2014 at 5:12 pm in reply to: AE CS6 11.0.1 CUDA BENCHMARK PROJECT – test your graphics cards!yonni writes:
> I really wanted those 4 gigs of ram, they do help me a lot in Mudbox.One option is to hunt for a used K5000, I managed to get a couple, also some used
6000s for an excellent price.> 780ti is a bit out of my budget, how bout gtx 780?
Also ok, though not as quick as two 580s. Not sure where 780 pricing is these days,
I guess it depends on whether you want max speed or efficiency.Having said that, did one vendor make a 6GB 780? Can’t recall offhand…
> get real time Playback even without any effects on the footage (1080P MOV png).
Is png really the best image format? Try using other formats, that might help.
> -When I set the project to use Cuda acceleration I do get the Yellow stripe on
> the timeline but after 2 seconds the playback get’s very choppy and many frames drops.What type of storage medium are you using? Best to use an SSD, or at the very least a good
RAID0 or RAID10 of quick drives.> something is just not working right there..
Sounds like the bottleneck is elsewhere, perhaps the I/O setup.
Ian.
——–
SGI Guru