Forum Replies Created

Page 2 of 2
  • G. scott Scribner

    October 14, 2013 at 6:33 pm in reply to: Motion blur moving the position of a layer?

    Yes, so because the layer is actually moved, I have to roto with mb on and hope it renders as I see it on screen. Previously I’d roto with mb off and render with it on and everything was fine. Now I just don’t trust it.

  • G. scott Scribner

    October 14, 2013 at 4:48 pm in reply to: Motion blur moving the position of a layer?

    Make a solid, 3d, make camera, set y rot keyframes on the camera panning across the solid. Now toggle mb for the comp on and off. You’ll see the layer’s anchor point and mask (if you want to make one,) jumping back and forth. Mb for the 3d layer doesn’t even have to be on.

  • G. scott Scribner

    October 12, 2013 at 7:01 pm in reply to: Motion blur moving the position of a layer?

    I’m not talking about the mb settings. What I’m saying is the physical location of the static layer in 3d space changes on screen when mb is activated. In my opinion this adds a variability to the comp that I don’t need. The anchor point of the layer jumps back and forth several pixels when toggling mb. In my opinion the anchor point should not move at all.

Page 2 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy