Forum Replies Created

Page 5 of 8
  • Derek Charles

    May 8, 2017 at 6:42 pm in reply to: 4K stabilizing Advice – My life is failing

    Hey Thanks for taking the time to write the stabilization tips
    I use a Sony a7sii – and you’re right – the IBIS is a huge help
    Next, I set the stabilization software to the lowest setting to barely crop in
    The other day I received my Zhiyun Crane V2 order, which should pretty much complete my style!
    Although, The biggest help for me has been the EVF – holding the camera up to my eye while filming adds an extra point of stability – granted it looks weird holding the camera there for minutes, and is uncomfortable – The footage is worth it.

  • Derek Charles

    May 8, 2017 at 5:30 am in reply to: 4K stabilizing Advice – My life is failing

    Rendering to a new track is what I usually do – I export to the same Sony codec Vegas matches my footage to (XAVC-S Long) Coming from my XAVC-S 100mbit 24p – How many times can I render the same event to a new track before compression comes in or creating artifacts to the color grading?

  • Derek Charles

    May 8, 2017 at 3:48 am in reply to: 4K stabilizing Advice – My life is failing

    Is there any way to trim or cut from the event without messing up the stabilization analysis?

  • Derek Charles

    May 8, 2017 at 2:49 am in reply to: 4K stabilizing Advice – My life is failing

    Thanks!
    That being said – I use proDAD Mercalli or Vegas’ stock stabilizer –
    After I “analyze” or run the stabilizer – If I trim any part of that file, the clip goes out of wack and I have to re run the stabilizer again after trimming – Is there anyway to prevent that? Other than rendering the file and then trimming from there – I thought creating a subclip would help with that, but no.

  • Derek Charles

    May 7, 2017 at 5:53 pm in reply to: 4K stabilizing Advice – My life is failing

    There’s no way to tell a difference in my test –
    This is more of a Timeline resolution thing
    If I take a screen shot of a 4k vs 1080 on the first frame, obviously the resolution is sharper.
    However I need to know the actual stabilization process on each timeline is doing the same thing.
    Someone once said, “Your 4k footage doesn’t magically turn into 1080 footage because you put it on a 1080 timeline” –
    but I’m thinking the stabilization process, it does…

  • Derek Charles

    March 15, 2017 at 2:19 am in reply to: 4K and Sharpening Image in Vegas – looks ugly

    Hey I’ve used your 0.001% sharpening advice some months ago with good results – thanks
    If I’m dialing detail all the way down IN camera. Should I even be adding the 0.001% in Vegas?
    I”m now only noticing there may be artifacts by adding even the small 0.001 or it may just give a peculiar look, with like miniature macroblocking or something- again on a small level, but with moving subjects, I wonder if it’s hurting the “natural” look I’m going for by dialing down detail In camera on purpose?

  • Derek Charles

    January 6, 2017 at 9:29 am in reply to: Please Save me Time in Vegas

    Thanks David, that makes sense to me –

    I’ll still just shoot in 4k and just drop into a 1080.
    Admittedly for my handheld run n gun style, I stabilize 80% of my clips though…
    It may be best to stabilize everything first on a 4k timeline, then drop those clips onto a 1080…

    What about I hear it’s better to shoot in 60p when I want to stabilize, because it gives it more frames to work with when stabilizing?
    I usually edit all of my 60p on a 1080 60p timeline
    slow down the footage to 0.4x playback,
    then export that to 24p,
    then drop that on a 1080 24p timeline – even if I’m not slowing the footage down,
    I still stabilize the 60
    export to 24p
    drop new clips on 24p timeline.
    (I know I should shoot in 24p if I’m not slowing down, but for stabilizing purposes…) plus Sometimes I just decide later if I’ll slow it down or not.)
    Are those the right steps? I should be good to go!

  • Derek Charles

    January 4, 2017 at 5:14 pm in reply to: Please Save me Time in Vegas

    But I’m editing in 1080 is the thing. So It’s treating the footage as if it was shot in 1080, so, there is no advantage to cropping. Also, the bit rate is the only thing that would make the 4k to 1080 footage better, since again I’m editing on a 1080 timeline…

  • Derek Charles

    January 4, 2017 at 9:45 am in reply to: Please Save me Time in Vegas

    Yes editing in 1080 is more comfortable
    but
    I’m losing the screenshot 4k jpeg resolution unless I switch project properties back to 4k –
    and
    I’m losing stabilization and cropping (re framing) resolution by editing in 1080

    So these are big things that make me think… Why not just shoot in 1080 if I’m editing in 1080?

    So really, the only benefit in shooting in 4k downscaling final render to 1080 shooters have is the bitrate?
    50Mbits for 1080
    instead of
    100Mbits in 4k

  • Derek Charles

    November 21, 2016 at 6:24 am in reply to: LUT presets in Vegas problem

    bumping this post up – I use VisionColor as my Lut loader plugin

Page 5 of 8

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy