Activity › Forums › Creative Community Conversations › To Editors thinking of switching to FCPX 10.1
-
To Editors thinking of switching to FCPX 10.1
James Lackleter replied 12 years, 5 months ago 35 Members · 110 Replies
-
Mark Raudonis
January 17, 2014 at 2:58 pmI regularly interview freelance editors in the LA market looking for work in Reality TV. I always make a point of asking them about “X”. “Do you know it?”, I ask. “Do you like it?, I enquire. “Do you know anyone who uses it?”
Inevitably, they make a face like someone just farted!
That’s a fact!
-
Ty Vann
January 17, 2014 at 3:05 pmThis OP is so funny. He actually believes that by airing his own failings with FCPX, he is doing everyone a favor. Thanks, but no thanks. FCPX does EVERYTHING I need in a modern EDL, and I make good money with it.
-
Daniel Frome
January 17, 2014 at 3:11 pmThink of it this way… just stop caring about XML, audio levels, standard color correction .. in ANY of the top NLEs and you suddenly gain that same efficiency of FCPX 🙂
-
Marcus Moore
January 17, 2014 at 3:12 pmThanks Mark, as ever, for your stirling and unbiased opinion.
If you’d asked people the same question about Premier 5 years ago (and maybe sooner) I’d wager you’d have gotten the same response.
-
Steve Connor
January 17, 2014 at 3:17 pm[Daniel Frome] “just stop caring about XML,”
Seems to work fine to Resolve and logic for me
[Daniel Frome] “audio levels”
Are you saying you can’t set correct audio levels?
[Daniel Frome] ” standard color correction “
How terrible, the colour board isn’t standard, despite the fact it works as well as other NLE’s CC
Steve Connor
There’s nothing we can’t argue about on the FCPX COW Forum
-
Steve Connor
January 17, 2014 at 3:21 pm[Marcus Moore] “Did I have a stroke? Is this 2011”
Looks like it
Steve Connor
There’s nothing we can’t argue about on the FCPX COW Forum
-
Ty Vann
January 17, 2014 at 3:33 pmguess you have never heard of how resolve or pro tools for finishing and you’d use them with FCPX?
-
Craig Seeman
January 17, 2014 at 3:58 pmPosts as such from the OP (and a few others) are so far out in that they air their own personal failures assuming the entire industry is in agreement, that I can’t help but think they’re being “encouraged” from other sources to spread FUD.
I guess one would have to believe Sam Mestman has never used or helped install FCPX anywhere and that Alex Van Hurkman really wants to waste his time at an event for FCPX based services in Los Angeles, where everyone resolutely refuses to use the FCPX “toy.”
Surely these are misguided people opening in a city that despises this NLE.
Or maybe they have some idea of the functionality and potential market for FCPX the OP can’t fathom (and the OP tries to persuade others of it).
https://www.fcpworks.com/special_event/
-
Bret Williams
January 17, 2014 at 4:10 pmI’m no grammatical expert but something isn’t quite right with that sentence.
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up