There WILL be a Premiere Pro CS7!!

[Walter Soyka]

[Joseph W. Bourke] “What are these new features, and are they something that a perpetual license owner would not get, and a Cloud user would? Just trying to clarify all of this as an owner of the CS6 Master Collection perpetual license. Just sorting out my options…”

This year, a few feature updates were released to Creative Cloud members that were not available to CS6 perpetual license holders.

Illustrator got the ability to package files (collect dependencies into a single folder) and to unembed images.

Photoshop got Smart Object support for Blur Gallery and Liquify, conditional actions, Retina display support, and some new CSS features for web designers.

Dreamweaver got some Cloud-only updates, too, but I don’t use it well enough to know. There were also updates to Muse.

Walter Soyka
Principal & Designer at Keen Live
Motion Graphics, Widescreen Events, Presentation Design, and Consulting
RenderBreak Blog – What I’m thinking when my workstation’s thinking
Creative Cow Forum Host: Live & Stage Events

[Richard Cardonna]

Does this mean that in the next release the perpetuals get everything the clouders have? meaning the upgrades to particular incommun app?

Adobe has not announced cs7 only the cloud version.So could it be that cs7 will be anounced further down the year so as to give the clouders the bang for there bucks?

[Joseph W. bourke]

Thanks Walter…that’s interesting – I guess it will behoove (this is the COW) all of us to keep our eyes on the variations within the “flavors” of licensing which are now available. I would be pretty upset, having bought the “full” version of the Master Collection, to not receive everything everyone else is getting. If it’s just a timing issue, I’m fine with it; if it’s a full version vs a crippled version, I’d be pretty upset. Although I’m sure Adobe is way ahead of all the speculation that’s going on right now – and which I’m a part of…

Joe Bourke
Owner/Creative Director
Bourke Media
http://www.bourkemedia.com

[Joseph W. bourke]

I’m just about to watch this, and haven’t seen it posted elsewhere:

https://nofilmschool.com/2013/04/nab-video-a-chat-with-adobe/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+nofilmschool+%28NoFilmSchool%29

Joe Bourke
Owner/Creative Director
Bourke Media
http://www.bourkemedia.com

[Steve Connor]

You can’t help liking Al Mooney! Wish there were more cutaways of the product though

Steve Connor

There’s nothing we can’t argue about on the FCPX COW Forum

[Richard Cardonna]

In the vimeo video Mooney (is he related to the cow) implies thay they have copied from fcp.
knowing how apples recent court behavior, this could happen.

Richard

[David Cherniack]

[Richard Cardonna] “n the vimeo video Mooney (is he related to the cow) implies thay they have copied from fcp.”

I didn’t come to that conclusion at all. He states that they wanted to add a lot of features that FCP editors were requesting. That’s far different from copying, unless you think that FCP copied features from early versions of Premiere (not Pro) when it was designed at Macromedia.

David
AllinOneFilms.com

[Joseph W. bourke]

Did you notice that as soon as he said that they copied from FCP, that he kind of backtracked? I think he realized that he put his foot in his mouth a bit…

That said – every NLE company has always been in a race to implement whatever the end users crowed about the loudest. It’s always been a race – often it was AVID vs FCP, Edit vs Media 100…
the list goes way back.

But Apple being who they are in terms of litigiousness, I wouldn’t be surprised at anything. Remember, it was Steve Jobs who said, “Good Artists Copy, Great Artists Steal”. We’ll see how far that goes in Apple’s perception of what constitutes stealing when it’s their feature which gets borrowed…

Joe Bourke
Owner/Creative Director
Bourke Media
http://www.bourkemedia.com

[David Lawrence]

[David Cherniack] “[Richard Cardonna] “n the vimeo video Mooney (is he related to the cow) implies thay they have copied from fcp.”

I didn’t come to that conclusion at all. He states that they wanted to add a lot of features that FCP editors were requesting. That’s far different from copying, unless you think that FCP copied features from early versions of Premiere (not Pro) when it was designed at Macromedia.”

I had the same impression. I don’t think Adobe has anything to worry about here 😉

_______________________
David Lawrence
art~media~design~research
propaganda.com
publicmattersgroup.com
facebook.com/dlawrence
twitter.com/dhl

[Charlie Austin]

[Richard Cardonna] “In the vimeo video Mooney (is he related to the cow) implies thay they have copied from fcp.
knowing how apples recent court behavior, this could happen.”

I’m pretty sure Apple don’t care that Adobe is copying features from software they EOL’d 2 years ago…

————————————————————-

~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~