Someone give me quaintifiable evidence of FCPX market penetration. Features. Industrials. Commercials. Weddings. Where?

[Charlie Austin]

[TImothy Auld] “What have you got on your side?
“

The fact that I work in movie marketing, I work with movie studios. I know how this stuff works. You can choose to discount that if you want. But I’m right. 😉

————————————————————-

~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

[Charlie Austin]

[TImothy Auld] ” never said I spoke for Apple and I don’t have the slightest idea how you drew that inference.”

The same way you drew this inference…

[TImothy Auld] “So you speak for Warner Brothers?”

————————————————————-

~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

[Timothy Auld]

Saying that marketing is not about money is like saying milk is not about cheese.

Tim

[Timothy Auld]

Yeah, you win that one.

Tim

[Shawn Miller]

[TImothy Auld] “Get a grip fellas. NDA’s do not apply to corporations. Corporation set the terms of NDA’s. If you think that Apple or Warner Brothers are constrained by any NDA the you are deluded.

Tim”

No… NDAs between corporations are as common as rainwater in Seattle. EVERYONE respects them and NO ONE breaks them, those that do open themselves up to years of litigation and potentially millions of dollars in court costs and fees. So yes, I think Charlie is completely right. Breaking agreements and running roughshod over WB’s marketing department does nothing for Apple, playing nice helps them retain access.

Shawn

[Charlie Austin]

[TImothy Auld] “Saying that marketing is not about money is like saying milk is not about cheese.”

Of course it is, and I don’t believe I said that. What I’m saying is that WB doesn’t want Apple, or anyone else, to talk about their movie yet. And Apple is going along with that. It has nothing to do with Apple’s feelings about FCP X. At all.

————————————————————-

~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

[Steve Connor]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQFKtI6gn9Y

[Charlie Austin]

I’m here for abuse. 🙂

————————————————————-

~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

[Andrew Kimery]

[TImothy Auld] ” I am making a pretty reasonable case for why “Focus” is not in FCPX’s In Action page.”

The reason Focus isn’t on FCPX’s action page is the same reason it’s not all over the FCP X blogs/websites, the people working on Focus are under NDAs. Same reason Avid and Adobe don’t plaster details about movies/tv shows that haven’t seen the light of day yet either.

[Timothy Auld]

And what I’m saying is that even is WB wanted to suppress that “Focus” was cut in FCPX they would not be able to. Money does control the conversation. And Apple has money. Yes?

Tim