-
Tom Smith
November 30, 2015 at 2:06 pmOk Ty, I understand what you are saying. Down the road I can always upgrade to the better recorder like Sound Devices 702 after I finish buying studio equipment (lighting, bass traps, new lenses, etc.).
For now, considering the microphone is in the same placement, would you recommend the $1000+ for the Sound Devices Mixpre D which will go straight into a DSLR with bad audio (but gain turned 1 level below very bottom, mainly using preamp) or the $170-250 Tascam 60/70d which will record audio itself?
-
Ty Ford
November 30, 2015 at 4:54 pmTom,
I have no way of knowing what your DSLR sounds like. I only know the 5D Mk iii can record OK audio.
If it will do that properly, I’d go right to the camera with a MixPre-D. Your postproduction life will be easier.
That way you begin to build a proper audio front end.
If your camera will not record good audio, then you have no choice but to go another way.
Regards,
Ty Ford
Cow Audio Forum LeaderWant better production audio?: Ty Ford’s Audio Bootcamp Field Guide
Ty Ford Blog: Ty Ford’s Blog -
Tom Smith
November 30, 2015 at 6:36 pmOk thanks, I think I’ll go with the MixPre D then unless anyone else has tried the two. The camera I have now is a t3i btw, later I will upgrade to 5dmkIII or Blackmagic production/cinema/ursa mini.
-
Tom Smith
December 1, 2015 at 10:25 amDo people put the microphone straight into Sound Devices 702 or is it better to put it into MixPre D into 702?
-
Ty Ford
December 1, 2015 at 10:07 pmHi Tom,
You can certainly go from mic to 702T. It also can supply Phantom Power to mics that require that.
More info here:
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/429564-REG/Sound_Devices_702T_702T_High_Resolution_Compact.html/BI/8631/KBID/9745Regards,
Ty Ford
Cow Audio Forum LeaderWant better production audio?: Ty Ford’s Audio Bootcamp Field Guide
Ty Ford Blog: Ty Ford’s Blog
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up