Resolve 10 – LightSpace CMS integration

[Robert Ruffo]

I tried latest version last week. Yes it’s better now, but CMS is still light years ahead.

CALMAN is for home theater calibration and that often shows. Its’ really more than good enough for a home theater, but not for us. For one thing, their cube simply does not have enough points. But that makes sense for their market, as it would be impractical for a home calibrator to spend 8 hours waiting for that many slides to go by. He would have to go to his client’s house twice, and make sure they disturbed nothing, did not turn on the lights, etc. during his absence At a color facility, we can just lock up, go home, and it’s ready the next morning.

The long way CMS uses is still way better.

[Margus Voll]

I found that cms was really fast with my setup.

1d+3d 17 step profiling took just an hour.

—

Margus

https://iconstudios.eu
https://vimeo.com/iconstudioseu/videos

DaVinci 9, OSX 10.7.4
MacPro 5.1 2×2,93 24GB
GTX 470 / Quadro 4000
Multibridge 2 Pro

[Robert Ruffo]

[Margus Voll] “I found that cms was really fast with my setup.

1d+3d 17 step profiling took just an hour.
“

That depends on the probe. You may also be using slide times that are too short for good precision. I use 10 seconds with my Hubble.

[Alex Jentz]

so it was also 1324 from friday sept 13th you tried?

and would you say that if calman would manage to read more points, and also take more time it could lead to similar as you say “real good” results as cms or do you think there is still problems in the math itself no matter how many points ?